:
:All internet pages sometimes take up to 3-4 mins to load. Other browsers
:are ok. Im uzing kazehakhase and its all good. By the way, firefox fails
:to load and no error is shown, it just sits there as if it was loading.
It sounds like a DNS problem.
:When im configuring a custom kernel i get this error:
:
:elevator# config EVELIN
:config: line 282: syntax error
:
:the error is caused by this line in EVELIN
:
:device snd_emu10k1
:
:Why doesnt this work?
It probably doesn't like the trailing digit... it probably thinks
it is a
> For further reference try
> playing a recent sony audio cd under windows.
> Soon you will only be
> able to play discs under windows exclusively...
What's wrong with that, precisely? So long as
there is no passing-off as a red-box compliant
product, then I can't see that Sony do not have
the
How about requesting that ATI/NVidia release information and drivers
on outdated cards - say, 2 year old cards. This is similar to the
tactic of many game companies; by the time it's released, it's of
little value to competition.
- BC
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
x.org's list is probably the best resource to look at, as that is what the
list would follow - the NVIDIA binary driver is a special case.
If you want to put it on a wiki: http://wiki.dragonflybsd.org/ ?
That list will work only if all the cards listed work (read: p
On Thu, February 16, 2006 10:52 am, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:10 -0600
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So I have a suggestion. Why dont we have a place on the web site
>> where a list of know working video cards and drivers can be listed.
>> (maybe its already there so
Exactly although I didnt see anything there about video cards. Maybe
somewhere in the DRfly wiki?
David
Marcin Jessa wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:10 -0600
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So I have a suggestion. Why dont we have a place on the web site
>> where a list of know wor
Adrian Michael Nida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >
> > It is spelled "UNIX", with all uppercase letters, and it is
> > not possible to form a plural like "UNIX's".
> >
>
> Very small grammar nit to pick. You can't form plurals by adding 's
> (unless it's a number
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:10 -0600
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I have a suggestion. Why dont we have a place on the web site
> where a list of know working video cards and drivers can be listed.
> (maybe its already there somewhere and I just haven't found it yet..)
Maybe something simi
So I have a suggestion. Why dont we have a place on the web site where a
list of know working video cards and drivers can be listed. (maybe its
already there somewhere and I just haven't found it yet..)
In the mean time, maybe Emiel can supply us with the email address of
the persons at Nvidia wh
>
> It is spelled "UNIX", with all uppercase letters, and it is
> not possible to form a plural like "UNIX's".
Very small grammar nit to pick. You can't form plurals by adding 's
(unless it's a number, symbol, etc.). The apostrophe is used to denote
possession not plurality. I'll spare the r
--- walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danial Thom wrote:
> >
> > --- Simon 'corecode' Schubert
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> David wrote:
> >>> So. What are those of us with Nvidia cards
> to
> >> do?...
>
> > I wonder if the open source weenies will ever
> > figure it out?
>
> >
--- Emiel Kollof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op donderdag 16 februari 2006 01:42, schreef
> Danial Thom:
>
> I know you are trolling again, but I'll bite
> this time. Don't bother replying
> to this as I don't have the desire to make this
> another friggin' Thread From
> Hell(tm).
>
> > I w
--- Steve O'Hara-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:31:35 -0800 (PST)
> Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You don't have a G-d given right to use other
> > people's work without paying a fee for it.
>
> No but having paid for it I expect to be able
> to
Chris Rawnsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am fairly new to DragonFlyBSD and Unix's (or is it better to say
> "*nix's"? :O Trademark issues!!) in general.
Off-topic, but since you asked ...
The Open Group, who is currently the owner of the "UNIX"
trademark, has published quite specific instr
Op donderdag 16 februari 2006 01:42, schreef Danial Thom:
I know you are trolling again, but I'll bite this time. Don't bother replying
to this as I don't have the desire to make this another friggin' Thread From
Hell(tm).
> I wonder if the open source weenies will ever
> figure it out?
Figure
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't have a G-d given right to use other
> people's work without paying a fee for it.
No but having paid for it I expect to be able to use it without
unreasonable restrictions. I also expect to be able
17 matches
Mail list logo
