Hi Everyone,
I wrote an MBR at one point - it's quite similar to FreeBSD's, except
instead of function keys it looks something like this:
Windows
> DragonFlyBSD
FreeBSD
Uhm, paste that into vi or something that has a set font size and it
will make sense! Anyway, you use the arrow keys and p
Is anyone planning to port RAIDFrame to DragonFly?
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:13:44PM -0800, walt wrote:
> I'm just thinking about how to keep software as free from bugs as
> possible. Linus once said: 'All bugs are shallow, given enough eyes.'
>
> Wouldn't moving kernel code into userspace increase the number of eyes?
The Thousand Eye Ball The
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> :
> :> ...we don't feel comfortable with a tcp stack in userland...
> :
> :Could you explain in basic bonehead terms why not? I've long
> :been a fan of the microkernel which runs *everything* in
> :userland.
[...]
> In a traditional
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 04:14:14PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> It would be disaster. It would become extremely difficult to track down
> bugs. And because of that I think its an ultra bad idea. It is not
> worth the ~1 uS savings per system call. It just isn't.
Esp. since I don
Peter Avalos wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:37:59PM +0100, Jonas Trollvik wrote:
Wouldnt it be possible to add some kind of graphical confirmation that
displays a gif with a code that can't be ocr scanned like a lot of
message boards / places do?
This would at least prevent automated spam
-J
:Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
:
:> ...we don't feel comfortable with a tcp stack in userland...
:
:Could you explain in basic bonehead terms why not? I've long
:been a fan of the microkernel which runs *everything* in
:userland.
:
:But (as my wife would quickly tell you) I'm an idiot :o)
:Is
Matthew Dillon wrote:
Heh. You beat me to the posting. Yah, Mr Backman interviewed me
yesterday!
This was a great interview! I hope the bsdtalk folks keep this up as
they are doing a great service to the BSD Community.
Scott
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 13:58 -0800, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> Sun's blog method is interesting; it provides another form
> field that requires one to answer a simple mathematical
> question (e.g. What is 75+22).
The question about user input got me thinking too and I thought of Sun's
blog also, I ju
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 01:55:52PM -0700, Peter Avalos wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:37:59PM +0100, Jonas Trollvik wrote:
> > Wouldnt it be possible to add some kind of graphical confirmation that
> > displays a gif with a code that can't be ocr scanned like a lot of
> > message boards / plac
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:37:59PM +0100, Jonas Trollvik wrote:
> Wouldnt it be possible to add some kind of graphical confirmation that
> displays a gif with a code that can't be ocr scanned like a lot of
> message boards / places do?
>
> This would at least prevent automated spam
> -Jonas
But t
Wouldnt it be possible to add some kind of graphical confirmation that
displays a gif with a code that can't be ocr scanned like a lot of
message boards / places do?
This would at least prevent automated spam
-Jonas
On 3/8/06, Axel Scheepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 11:1
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 11:18 -0800, Ben Cadieux wrote:
> Scripts to automate abusing wikis? What's wrong with people...
>
Hi Ben,
Well, that's life these days. I wish it was all love and peace all over
again but I'm affraid these days are gone.. :(
> I think their IPs should be PF'ed out of all
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> ...we don't feel comfortable with a tcp stack in userland...
Could you explain in basic bonehead terms why not? I've long
been a fan of the microkernel which runs *everything* in
userland.
But (as my wife would quickly tell you) I'm an idiot :o)
Is your objec
:
:Scripts to automate abusing wikis? What's wrong with people...
:
:I think their IPs should be PF'ed out of all dragonfly-related
:systems. Wikis record them, don't they?
They're usually run from compromised machines, just like normal spam
is sent from compromised machines. So mappin
Scripts to automate abusing wikis? What's wrong with people...
I think their IPs should be PF'ed out of all dragonfly-related
systems. Wikis record them, don't they?
Hi all,
recent spam characteristics in the Wiki indicate that spammers are
setting up scripts to automate their spamming more and more.
So far our stategy has been to manually revert the change and block the
user name (this is about as much as Wikimedia allows, at least from what
I've seen).
:On Tue, 8 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:> I've got 1.4.0 installed and I am trying to get to 1.4.2 After
:> cvsuping the src I am left with 617MB on /usr. Ultimately, as a
:> firewall this will be quite adequate. However, I've demonstrated to
:> myself that it is not enough room to
:
:Matt on bsdtalk podcast!
:
:http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
:
:Sync'd through to my iPod fine and I listened to it on the train to
:work - very interesting!
:
:Cheers Steve
Heh. You beat me to the posting. Yah, Mr Backman interviewed me
yesterday!
Miguel Filipe wrote:
I think the dragonflyBSD team must read this, and apply the same
principles to make the DFly networking stack "super-hot".
of course we already read this paper. i quickly discussed this with
matt, and i think we agree that we don't feel comfortable with a tcp
stack in us
Hi,
I recently read a presentation about how to speed up networking, from
Van Jacobson.
I think the dragonflyBSD team must read this, and apply the same
principles to make the DFly networking stack "super-hot".
I also should point out that some of the ideias/principles are
allready considered in
Matt on bsdtalk podcast!
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
Sync'd through to my iPod fine and I listened to it on the train to
work - very interesting!
Cheers Steve
22 matches
Mail list logo
