At Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:52:21 -0500 (EST),
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
Out of curiousity, I thought I'd try running make buildworld with the -j
option in a few different configurations to see what difference it made.
I know it's supposed to speed up the process by a certain amount because
of
Op dinsdag 14 maart 2006 08:17, schreef Karthik Subramanian:
Hi Folks,
After installing DragonFly on a spare box at work, I was trying out asimple
Hello World in assembly, and found that one needed to do alittle more
than as -o hello.o hello.s; ld -o hello hello.o to getit to work; here's
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:47:56PM +0530, Karthik Subramanian wrote:
2. Ran as -o hello.o hello.s; ld -o hello hello.o; ./hello, and sawthis on
the console:
ELF binary type 0 not known.Abort trap
Sure. DragonFly uses the ELF ABI note as you found out later to decide
which kernel ABI to use.
I hope this won't be counted as advertisement, but these system looks
very interesting:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30258
http://www.tyan.com/products/html/clusterservers.html
--
reezer
Sorry for bad English :-(
On Mon, March 13, 2006 8:52 pm, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
Out of curiousity, I thought I'd try running make buildworld with the
-j option in a few different configurations to see what difference
it made. I know it's supposed to speed up the process by a certain
amount because of the parallel
:
:I hope this won't be counted as advertisement, but these system looks
:very interesting:
:http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30258
:http://www.tyan.com/products/html/clusterservers.html
:
:--
:reezer
:Sorry for bad English :-(
Those are just big MP boxes with lots of cpus. That's not
On Mar 14, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:I hope this won't be counted as advertisement, but these system looks
:very interesting:
:http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30258
:http://www.tyan.com/products/html/clusterservers.html
:
:--
:reezer
:Sorry for bad English :-(
Those
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
Out of curiousity, I thought I'd try running make buildworld with the -j
option in a few different configurations to see what difference it made.
I know it's supposed to speed up the process by a certain amount because
of the parallel processing, but there's no direct
Matthew Dillon wrote:
Yah. Blades with MP cpus or multi-core capable cpus on them. Just
a blade server, then. The difference between blade based clustering
and the type of clustering that we want to do is that we want to be
able to cluster efficiently over a LAN or WAN (i.e.
:Hmm,
:
:from time to time I try to imagine how it would be when DragonFly's
:clustering became reality.
:
:Is the goal to be able to just stick in a new DragonFly box and then the
:power of the cluster machine increases? I mean, I wonder if there
:would be any configuration requirements for
:Clustering over LAN or WAN is good, but aren't high speed links 'icing
:on the cake'? It's possible to be able to do either/or isn't it?
:
:Joey
Algorithms designed to operate over a WAN will work just as well over
a high speed link. But algorithms that are designed to work on high
11 matches
Mail list logo