Pieter Dumon wrote:
*snip*
... I get the same problem for instance when untarring an
archive of some tens of MB: it takes ages.
I haven't had a DragonFly install active for over a year, but using a tarball we
all have access to - the 98.5 MB DFLY 1.6 iso, I get:
===
2U server:
time
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:02:09PM -0400, Haidut wrote:
> I have a question about creating live CD based on Dragonfly. Is there
> any way to download the scripts/tools used to enerate the official
> Dragonfly live CD used for installation?
The official live CD is built with the content in src/nrel
Haidut wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about creating live CD based on Dragonfly. Is there
any way to download the scripts/tools used to enerate the official
Dragonfly live CD used for installation? If not, is the package
"mklivecd" available in NetBSD ported to Dragonfly? If Dragonfly is
using
Hi all,
I have a question about creating live CD based on Dragonfly. Is there
any way to download the scripts/tools used to enerate the official
Dragonfly live CD used for installation? If not, is the package
"mklivecd" available in NetBSD ported to Dragonfly? If Dragonfly is
using the pkgsrc sys
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:52:51 +0800
Bill Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll refrain from calling X+ 'stupid' for an OS make/install cycle,
> but
> only out of incredulity. There's one hog that should be shut down in favor of
> a
> simple (ssh-ed) CLI when doing resource-intensive make/bui
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 02:55:00PM +0530, Karthik Subramanian wrote:
I was fooling around a little with getdents (yes, I know that I
shouldn't be using getdents!) and found that the getdents manpage
happened to say this about struct dirent:
Yeah, you shouldn't :-)
T
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 02:55:00PM +0530, Karthik Subramanian wrote:
> I was fooling around a little with getdents (yes, I know that I
> shouldn't be using getdents!) and found that the getdents manpage
> happened to say this about struct dirent:
Yeah, you shouldn't :-)
> The data in the buffer i
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pieter Dumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 26, 2006 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: disk diagnostics
To: Bill Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, nothing like that. It's the same whether I'm running it in a
console or in an xterm running as the only app in X. And t
Bill Hacker wrote:
*SNIP*
*Especially so* if it has a filemanager view window open and is trying
to keep it current and sorted.
Also - are you perchance logging the progress and/or appending to a file?
Bill
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:06:57AM +0800, Bill Hacker wrote:
softupdates? writing meta data with sync will be really slow.
No, not *that* slow, not even on K6-2-500 with 256 MB of SDRAM, where I
have done it on a production FreeBSD 4.8 web & mx box for donkey's ye
Pieter Dumon wrote:
Wow, not too fast. I don't have access to my machine right now (I'm at
work), so I will post detailed stats later (timed rm, top output, ...)
- no servers (web,mail,smb,) are running
- no other users present
- no cron jobs or other daemons or other processes apart from th
Hi Folks,
I was fooling around a little with getdents (yes, I know that I
shouldn't be using getdents!) and found that the getdents manpage
happened to say this about struct dirent:
-- snip --
The data in the buffer is a series of dirent structures each containing
the following entries:
I'd be happy to help with further debugging if anyone wants help.
Hi Folks,
Sorry for the long absence, I'd been ill, and then had been busy with work.
Unfortunately the friend of mine whose USB stick I'd been borrowing is
out of circulation for some time, so I won't be able to debug with t
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:06:57AM +0800, Bill Hacker wrote:
> >softupdates? writing meta data with sync will be really slow.
>
> No, not *that* slow, not even on K6-2-500 with 256 MB of SDRAM, where I
> have done it on a production FreeBSD 4.8 web & mx box for donkey's years
> (too small to ho
Wow, not too fast. I don't have access to my machine right now (I'm at
work), so I will post detailed stats later (timed rm, top output, ...)
- no servers (web,mail,smb,) are running
- no other users present
- no cron jobs or other daemons or other processes apart from the
standard system pro
15 matches
Mail list logo
