On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:36:40PM -0700, Peter Avalos wrote:
> Since we're using pkgsrc, is there a good reason we have lukemftp/nftp
> in our src tree? It seems like it'd be best to remove it from our tree
> and if people want to use it, they can just install it from pkgsrc.
> What's everyone el
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:36:40PM -0700, Peter Avalos wrote:
> Since we're using pkgsrc, is there a good reason we have lukemftp/nftp
> in our src tree? It seems like it'd be best to remove it from our tree
> and if people want to use it, they can just install it from pkgsrc.
> What's everyone el
Since we're using pkgsrc, is there a good reason we have lukemftp/nftp
in our src tree? It seems like it'd be best to remove it from our tree
and if people want to use it, they can just install it from pkgsrc.
What's everyone else think?
--Peter
pgp21MnipXiCV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
David Aubril wrote:
Well, unfortunately, I am not a developper ; just a french teacher. I
would have love to help, but this is way too far for me. Thanks for your
answers, though.
And what is it that you have discovered that the French are willing to be
taught?
;-)
Yury Tarasievich wrote
Well, unfortunately, I am not a developper ; just a french teacher. I
would have love to help, but this is way too far for me. Thanks for your
answers, though.
Yury Tarasievich wrote:
On 28/09/06, David Aubril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi everyone.
Well, yet another question. I have
On 28/09/06, David Aubril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi everyone.
Well, yet another question. I have dragonfly running on a quite old
pc, so I'm waiting for pkgsrc 2006Q3 to build anything, since it's going
to take a couple of hours.
Well, here is my question : I didn't see any wine b
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:20:47PM +0200, David Aubril wrote:
>Well, here is my question : I didn't see any wine binary package, on
> any of the ftp repositories. Is there a reason for that ? Does that mean
> that wine doesn't build on dragonfly ?
It won't run without a number of VM changes.
hi everyone.
Well, yet another question. I have dragonfly running on a quite old
pc, so I'm waiting for pkgsrc 2006Q3 to build anything, since it's going
to take a couple of hours.
Well, here is my question : I didn't see any wine binary package, on
any of the ftp repositories. Is ther
> I can't find ms-ttf on the servers : ftp://packages.stura.uni-rostock ,
> and others binary mirrors diplayed here :
> http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/download.cgi
>
> Can you tell me where I can find this package, please ? (sorry for this
> newbee question)
I forgot about that bogus re
Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 16:31 schrieb Frank Petitjean:
> Le Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:44:04 +0200, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
>
> écrit:
> > Install more fonts. Configure your system to use your preferred fonts
> > first. Try your KControl font installer. Maybe install Windows True Ty
Frank Petitjean wrote:
I can't find ms-ttf on the servers : ftp://packages.stura.uni-rostock ,
and others binary mirrors diplayed here :
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/download.cgi
Can you tell me where I can find this package, please ? (sorry for this
newbee question)
Thought abou
Le Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:44:04 +0200, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit:
Install more fonts. Configure your system to use your preferred fonts
first. Try your KControl font installer. Maybe install Windows True Type
fonts (such as pkgsrc/fonts/ms-ttf).
Thanks Jeremy, I understand
Hi,
afaik, ZFS support in DFLY hasn't arrived yet..
read this:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2006-06/msg00047.html
On 9/28/06, Vladimir Mitiouchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/9/28, Erik Wikström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> from kernel when files change. What would have been rea
On 2006-09-28 15:45, Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:
2006/9/28, Erik Wikström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
from kernel when files change. What would have been really nice in this
situation is ZFS, which has built-in checksums.
DragonFly supports ZFS, right? Is it stable enough to run system-for-fun?
No, n
2006/9/28, Erik Wikström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
from kernel when files change. What would have been really nice in this
situation is ZFS, which has built-in checksums.
DragonFly supports ZFS, right? Is it stable enough to run system-for-fun?
--
Sincerely Yours,
Vladimir Mitiouchev
On 2006-09-28 14:18, Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:
28 Sep 2006 11:41:59 GMT, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
However, fsck can neither detect nor repair any damage in
the contents of files.
So, do You have any simple ideas how to detect damage in files?
Checksums, or sth? Something simple and w
28 Sep 2006 11:41:59 GMT, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
However, fsck can neither detect nor repair any damage in
the contents of files.
So, do You have any simple ideas how to detect damage in files?
Checksums, or sth? Something simple and working. And automagic ;-) Is
there any solutions?
Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > And if you did, you should newfs(8) the file system when
> > you replaced the cables with good ones.
>
> Q: Why fsck is not enough?
fsck(8) is only able to detect certain (not even all, I
believe) inconsistencies in the meta data of a fil
18 matches
Mail list logo