Matthew Dillon wrote:
[...]
CPU overhead is a different beast entirely. SSH has a lot of encryption
and decryption overhead... my transfers over localhost top out at
21.8 MBytes/sec on my test box.
The good old ssh1 package had a -c none option which
disabled encryption
Hi,
On 12 Oct 2006 07:50:53 GMT, Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
[...]
CPU overhead is a different beast entirely. SSH has a lot of encryption
and decryption overhead... my transfers over localhost top out at
21.8 MBytes/sec on my test box.
The
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa
Filipe wrote:
Just to add that the fastest ssh ciphers I've tested are:
blowfish-cbc
Good alternative to AES for most applications and often much faster.
arcfour
Be careful when using RC4. As it is stream chiffre,
On 10/12/06, Joerg Sonnenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa
Filipe wrote:
Just to add that the fastest ssh ciphers I've tested are:
blowfish-cbc
Good alternative to AES for most applications and often much faster.
New predictions from our old friend Danial Thom:
My prediction is that a year from now we'll all
be using DragonflyBSD and you guys will be
looking for a new bunch of beta-test guinea pigs.
Thanks to Ancient on #dragonflybsd for noticing.
Sascha Wildner wrote:
New predictions from our old friend Danial Thom:
My prediction is that a year from now we'll all
be using DragonflyBSD and you guys will be
looking for a new bunch of beta-test guinea pigs.
Thanks to Ancient on #dragonflybsd for noticing.
I have to say that I agree with most of DT comments regarding the state of
FreeBSD5+, after having watched the progress (or lack there of) for over
three years.
snipMaybe its just time for the entire FreeBSD team
to come out of its world of delusion and come to
terms with what every real-life
