comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
Since cvsup is somewhat of a hassle to build, discussion comes up from time to time about switching to rsync. Rsync is generally accepted as slower/more resource intensive, but how much hasn't been quantified. I wanted to look into this in as un-bikesheddy a way as possible... I timed repeated

Chlamydia lost php-5.2.0?

2007-04-10 Thread Mischa Peters
Hi All, Trying to install php5 from pkgsrc (chlamydia), which failed. It seems that php-5.2.0.tgz is no longer there. ftp cd pub/DragonFly/packages/RELEASE/i386/lang 250 CWD command successful. ftp dir php-5.2.0.tgz 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||50030|) 150 Opening ASCII mode data

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I timed repeated retrievals of src from theshell.com over the past few :weeks, and here's the result. : :Retrieving all of src: :cvsup averaged about 11.5 minutes :rsync averaged about 19 minutes : :Retrieving only the last 24 hours of changes: :cvsup averaged about 18 seconds :

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Dmitri Nikulin
On 4/11/07, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We could just distribute the CVS tree and write a front-end utility in csh or sh that we distribute along with the rest of the system to do the nitty gritty work of actually checking something out into /usr/src. In fact, I

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Matthew Dillon wrote: My only worry is figuring out how to run the rsync daemon safely. I'm a bit paranoid about running things on crater but I do agree that we would have to run the master rsync daemon there. You can run rsyncd from inetd or standalone. If you're really[tm]

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Dmitri Nikulin wrote: We could just distribute the CVS tree and write a front-end utility in csh or sh that we distribute along with the rest of the system to do the nitty gritty work of actually checking something out into /usr/src. In fact, I think that would be preferable.

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2007 Apr 10 (Tue) at 18:03:49 +0200 (+0200), Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: :cvsync does cvs-only (so, :like rsync), but it has a bug which breaks the RCS files in some cases. :The author didn't want to fix it though :/ Can you describe the bug? I've been using cvsync for local copies of

Re: Chlamydia lost php-5.2.0?

2007-04-10 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:18 am, Mischa Peters wrote: Hi All, Trying to install php5 from pkgsrc (chlamydia), which failed. It seems that php-5.2.0.tgz is no longer there. Any package that has at least 1 open security advisory against it at the time of building gets put in /vulnerable instead

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:32 am, Matthew Dillon wrote: We could just distribute the CVS tree and write a front-end utility in csh or sh that we distribute along with the rest of the system to do the nitty gritty work of actually checking something out into /usr/src. In fact,

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Peter Hessler wrote: On 2007 Apr 10 (Tue) at 18:03:49 +0200 (+0200), Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: :cvsync does cvs-only (so, :like rsync), but it has a bug which breaks the RCS files in some cases. :The author didn't want to fix it though :/ Can you describe the bug? I've been using

Re: Chlamydia lost php-5.2.0?

2007-04-10 Thread Mischa Peters
Trying to install php5 from pkgsrc (chlamydia), which failed. It seems that php-5.2.0.tgz is no longer there. Any package that has at least 1 open security advisory against it at the time of building gets put in /vulnerable instead of /All, so that you can't accidentally install software

Re: [HEADS UP] Binary package changes

2007-04-10 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 05:32:59PM +0200, Grzegorz B?ach wrote: I can't install any packages from pkgsrc-box.org, but from pkgsrc.dragonflybsd.org it works OK. Can you rebuild pkg_install with the attached patch and see if that works? Joerg Index: ftpio.c

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
I am now running an rsync server on crater.dragonflybsd.org, serving the cvs repository as 'dragonfly_cvs'. rsync -a rsync://crater.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly_cvs blahblah -- Unfortunately I don't know how to get rsyncd to just log statistics on completion, and it

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Matthew Dillon wrote: I am now running an rsync server on crater.dragonflybsd.org, serving the cvs repository as 'dragonfly_cvs'. rsync -a rsync://crater.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly_cvs blahblah very nice! will immediatelly switch to rsync operation. however, i'll have to find

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Matthew Dillon wrote: I am now running an rsync server on crater.dragonflybsd.org, serving the cvs repository as 'dragonfly_cvs'. rsync -a rsync://crater.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly_cvs blahblah Matt, something is weird with the permissions: %rsync

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: I am now running an rsync server on crater.dragonflybsd.org, serving the cvs repository as 'dragonfly_cvs'. rsync -a rsync://crater.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly_cvs blahblah very nice! will immediatelly switch to rsync operation. however, i'll

Re: comparing cvsup vs. rsync

2007-04-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Matt, : :something is weird with the permissions: : :%rsync crater.dragonflybsd.org::dragonfly_cvs/src/crypto/heimdal/Attic/ :drwxrwxr-x1024 2005/03/28 05:35:43 . :-r--rw-r-- 20313 2005/03/28 05:35:43 ChangeLog,v :[..] :-r-xrwxr-x3242 2005/03/28 05:35:43 compile,v : :why