Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:49:30 -0800 walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > > > add > > PKG_OPTIONS.xorg-server= dri > > to /usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf. For modular xorg it should be: PKG_OPTIONS.modular-xorg-server=dri > I'm running out of

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Johannes Hofmann
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I am serving you hot + fresh a new dri/drm port. I'd like everybody to >> try and use it and to report back on success and problems. I'd like to >> commit this update before the release.

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread walt
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > Hey, > > I am serving you hot + fresh a new dri/drm port. I'd like everybody to > try and use it and to report back on success and problems. I'd like to > commit this update before the release. > > What you need to do: > > Update to latest

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Johannes Hofmann
Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> It definitely does need the conditionals around those free calls to avoid >> crashing though. The only thing I'm not sure about is which is the error - >> freeing them when they are NULL or them being NULL in the fi

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:12:08 +0100 Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everybody (especially those who had problems with panics), please do a > > git pull > This should fix the problems. It does - nice work! -- C:>WIN | Dir

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: It definitely does need the conditionals around those free calls to avoid crashing though. The only thing I'm not sure about is which is the error - freeing them when they are NULL or them being NULL in the first place. Okay, I missed that during porting and had forgot

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:25:22 +0100 "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > Just in case bufflist and/or pagelist ever do get populated. It > > works although the glxgears performance isn't as good as I thought it > > would be (~480 fps) - it is *m

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: Just in case bufflist and/or pagelist ever do get populated. It works although the glxgears performance isn't as good as I thought it would be (~480 fps) - it is *much* better than without drm though. For me glxgears performance degrades with direct rendering,

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Hasso Tepper
Hasso Tepper wrote: > Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > > mkdir /dev/dri > > mknod /dev/dri/card0 c 145 0 0:0 > > chmod a+rw /dev/dri/card0 > > For some reason it doesn't work for me in my desktop. Xorg (probably) > deletes it as soon as I start X (via kdm). And although it survives > kdm/X start

Re: drm/dri update

2008-01-08 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On 07 Jan 2008 22:31:56 GMT Johannes Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > I got it working with Great! I went for a variation viz: --- drm_dma.c.orig 2008-01-07 14:35:13 + +++ drm_dma.c 2008-01-08 09:21:33 + @@ -81,8 +81,10 @@ } }