On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:32:42PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :I have used cpdup a few times. Today I read some more in the manpage.
> :I see it can do synchronize mirrors remotely. This sounds great.
> :
> :Has anyone done any comparisons or benchmarks between it and rsync? I am
> :especia
:I have used cpdup a few times. Today I read some more in the manpage.
:I see it can do synchronize mirrors remotely. This sounds great.
:
:Has anyone done any comparisons or benchmarks between it and rsync? I am
:especially curious if should start using cpdup instead :)
Well, I doubt it wou
I have used cpdup a few times. Today I read some more in the manpage.
I see it can do synchronize mirrors remotely. This sounds great.
Has anyone done any comparisons or benchmarks between it and rsync? I am
especially curious if should start using cpdup instead :)
Ok, I think I've bashed cpdup's new features into shape on HEAD.
Beware that the updated cpdup must be running on both sides of the
link to use the new feature and there is no endian conversion.
The new feature is '-pN', e.g. -p16, which parallelizes operations
when the source
I don't think there's anything we can do, the machine took a NMI fault
in the middle of a normal instruction. There might be some BIOS settings
you can play with but it looks like a real ram fault to me. I searched
around google for a bit but didn't see anything specific.
