Re: Minimum size for a hammer file system?

2010-04-24 Thread Sascha Wildner
Am 23.04.2010 11:47, schrieb Steve O'Hara-Smith: On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:21:27 +0200 Sascha Wildners...@online.de wrote: Am 23.04.2010 09:19, schrieb Colin Adams: I thought I had previously seen (on this mailing list) advice that hammer was designed for use on 500GB systems or bigger.

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
I've been thinking about the issue of mounting snapshots and I have an idea. In order for a slave snapshot link to work it must reference the @@transactionid:pfsid portion of the softlink relative to the base HAMMER filesystem the PFS was created in. You can do this by

Re: Disabling snapshot symlinks during manual snapshot

2010-04-24 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am 22.04.2010 07:30, schrieb Siju George: The pfs is mounted inside the snapshot Directory. For a MS Windows user it will look like the actual pic below. http://picasaweb.google.com/sgeorge.ml/OpenBSDDesktop#5462824618389365522 Clicking on the snapshot Directory they can get the snapshot

kontact is blank, kmail doesn't know imap

2010-04-24 Thread Pierre Abbat
I know I had kmail working before, because it came up and asked for my password on the IMAP connection. I just installed kdepim and ran kontact. I got the following messages: -bash-3.2$ kio (KMimeType): WARNING: KServiceType::offers : servicetype Kontact/Plugin not found kontact: WARNING: