Re: Dual use Filesystem

2011-03-24 Thread Matthias Rampke
On Montag, 21. März 2011 at 00:31, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: ext3 or UFS might be at least readable for each side. However, the lowest-common-denominator of DOS (i.e. FAT) is possibly the most portable. From my experience, ext2fs seems to be the most widespread filesystem among the unix-ish

Re: Dual use Filesystem

2011-03-24 Thread Alexander Polakov
* Matthias Rampke matthias.ram...@googlemail.com [110324 12:39]: On Montag, 21. März 2011 at 00:31, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: ext3 or UFS might be at least readable for each side. However, the lowest-common-denominator of DOS (i.e. FAT) is possibly the most portable. From my experience,

Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing

2011-03-24 Thread Max Herrgard
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Sepherosa Ziehausepher...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Please test ~sephe/acpi_randy branch on leaf It includes: 1) Latest ACPI code (20110211). Thank Magliano Andrea very much for the porting 2) ACPI based interrupt routing To test the

Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing

2011-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi Sephe. Great work :) : :Seems to boot fine on my x86_64 UP box. Anything you want tested with it :running? Verbose dmesg: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~mh/vdmesg_acpi_randy : :However, it makes my graphics card (an ati 9200 agp) lose some speed. It :usually gets ~1600 fps with glxgears and

Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing

2011-03-24 Thread Antonio Huete Jimenez
Hi Sephe, I've tested it again with latest master + latest acpi_randy branch and it still doesn't work without ioapic enabled. The livelock limit engaged is displayed every few seconds, it's related to irq3. The hard disk can't be initialized and it shows many DMA errors in the mean time until

Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing

2011-03-24 Thread Max Herrgard
Matthew Dillon wrote: :However, it makes my graphics card (an ati 9200 agp) lose some speed. It :usually gets ~1600 fps with glxgears and with 2) enabled it drops to ~20 :fps. From what I can see it gives no error about this problem. : ://Max What about the rest of the system? Run some

Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing

2011-03-24 Thread Max Herrgard
Matthew Dillon wrote: :However, it makes my graphics card (an ati 9200 agp) lose some speed. It :usually gets ~1600 fps with glxgears and with 2) enabled it drops to ~20 :fps. From what I can see it gives no error about this problem. : ://Max What about the rest of the system? Run some

Re: ACPI based interrupt routing and new ACPI code ready for testing

2011-03-24 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Max Herrgard herrg...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew Dillon wrote: :However, it makes my graphics card (an ati 9200 agp) lose some speed. It :usually gets ~1600 fps with glxgears and with 2) enabled it drops to ~20 :fps. From what I can see it gives no error about