Hi,
I De-Duped the second disk on the backup Server today.
Before De-Dup
FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
Backup2 454G 335G 119G74%/Backup2
After De-Dup
FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
Backup2
Hi,
I got these on my DragonFly v2.11.0.247.gda17d9-DEVELOPMENT
[diagnostic] cache_lock: blocked on 0xdacafa28 "2.0"
[diagnostic] cache_lock: unblocked 2.0 after 9 secs
[diagnostic] cache_lock: blocked on 0xdc244c18 "2.0"
[diagnostic] cache_lock: unblocked 2.0 after 2 secs
[diagnostic] cache_lock
BSDday Argentina 2011 - http://www.bsdday.org.ar/
4-5 Nov.
Buenos Aires City, Argentina
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Buenos Aires
*BSD users in Argentina call to the community of free software, users,
system administrators and developers of BSD systems for participation
on
On 2011-07-19, Siju George wrote:
Hi Siju,
> Short Sumary before dedup of firtst Hard Disk
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> Backup1 454G 451G 2.8G99%/Backup1
>
> Short Sumary after dedup of firtst Hard Disk
>
> Filesystem
:Hi,
:
:I got these on my DragonFly v2.11.0.247.gda17d9-DEVELOPMENT
:
:[diagnostic] cache_lock: blocked on 0xdacafa28 "2.0"
:[diagnostic] cache_lock: unblocked 2.0 after 9 secs
:[diagnostic] cache_lock: blocked on 0xdc244c18 "2.0"
:[diagnostic] cache_lock: unblocked 2.0 after 2 secs
:[diagnostic]
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Thomas Keusch
wrote:
>
> nice statistics. I can not provide stats of my own, as I don't run
> Dragonfly yet, so I'm more of a hypothetical user right now. But one
> thing that's of interest to me is how long did the de-dupe process take?
>
I ran them one by one. a
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
>
> No, as long as the blockages unblock at some point it's ok. The
> blockages are likely due to hammer's flusher. I have a patch under
> test (related to the blogbench thread) that also seems to reduce
> the namecache stalls.
>
