On Wed, October 21, 2009 12:19 pm, Saifi Khan wrote:
> Justin, thats awesome piece of work.
>
> Do you think it is a good idea to "weigh"
> build-fail/broken/masked packages against a usage list like
> https://www.osscensus.org/packages-rank-public.php?offset=0&limit=778&page=0
That's a good idea
On Wed, October 21, 2009 12:36 pm, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
>> These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or
>> manual
>> download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem,
>> which I've fixed and the next run (already star
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Wed, October 21, 2009 12:36 pm, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or
manual
download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem,
which I've fixed and the next r
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or manual
download. The report didn't upload because of a permissions problem,
which I've fixed and the next run (already started) should have an
up-to-date report to accompany it.
Do you think you can pu
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
> Binary package build for DragonFly 2.5.x on amd64 has completed, with a
> greater-than-I-expected number of packages building.
>
> Total number of packages: 8969
> Successfully built: 7475
> Failed to build: 359
>
Binary package build for DragonFly 2.5.x on amd64 has completed, with a
greater-than-I-expected number of packages building.
It's at:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/amd64/DragonFly-2.5.1/stable/
These should work for all amd64 versions, via pkgin or pkg_radd or manual
download. The repo
