Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-05-02 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hi, * Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > > www.dragonflybsd.org's updated, both in ikiwiki version and the note on > the edit page - if the message still isn't dramatic enough, we can make it > more noticeable. Thanks for your work! Let's try it with this message and see if its works. If not, we coul

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-30 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Tue, April 27, 2010 9:44 pm, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, April 27, 2010 5:04 am, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Matthias Schmidt wrote: > >>> We could add line in blinking, red letters "Please provide a commit >>> message" ;) This should be possible w/o digging into the i

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-27 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Tue, April 27, 2010 5:04 am, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Matthias Schmidt wrote: >> We could add line in blinking, red letters "Please provide a commit >> message" ;) This should be possible w/o digging into the ikiwiki >> internals. > > Very easy. > > create a templatedir > c

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-27 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Matthias Schmidt wrote: > > I'd like to see enforced messages too. I don't see an easy way to > > do that. > > We could add line in blinking, red letters "Please provide a commit > message" ;) This should be possible w/o digging into the ikiwiki > internals. Very easy. c

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-27 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Monday 26 April 2010 22:04:54 Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > We could do what NetBSD does with their online bug forms. There's a last > sentence that says "This server runs NetBSD. To verify you are not a bot, > which OS does this server run?" with a little spot to type "NetBSD". We > could do th

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Moin, * Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > > I'd like to see enforced messages too. I don't see an easy way to do that. We could add line in blinking, red letters "Please provide a commit message" ;) This should be possible w/o digging into the ikiwiki internals. Cheers Matthias

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Moin, * Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > > We could do what NetBSD does with their online bug forms. There's a last > sentence that says "This server runs NetBSD. To verify you are not a bot, > which OS does this server run?" with a little spot to type "NetBSD". We > could do the same, possibly. Gr

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :On Mon, April 26, 2010 9:01 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: :> Hmm. Well, when I think about it careful its more of a bad memory :> than anything recent. I do like the idea of having an :> easy-to-remember global password that we can just paste on irc. :> It might be worth trying th

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Mon, April 26, 2010 9:01 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Hmm. Well, when I think about it careful its more of a bad memory > than anything recent. I do like the idea of having an > easy-to-remember global password that we can just paste on irc. > It might be worth trying that. We

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
Hmm. Well, when I think about it careful its more of a bad memory than anything recent. I do like the idea of having an easy-to-remember global password that we can just paste on irc. It might be worth trying that. -Matt

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Mon, April 26, 2010 11:36 am, Matthias Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > as you might noticed the amount of spam in our wiki increases (at least > in my opinion). I'm only noticing one "spamming" event maybe every couple of weeks. Am I missing more items? I watch page changes through RSS. The old wi

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
I agree completely w/ regards to requiring registrations to be vetted. I'm kinda getting tired of the wiki getting messed up all the time too. -Matt

Amount of wiki spam

2010-04-26 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hi, as you might noticed the amount of spam in our wiki increases (at least in my opinion). I thought about some possibilities to reduce the amount of spam. What do you guys think about it? - Registering a new account is no longer possible without administrator approval. Is this supported by