Thanks, guys. Yes, I can see how it would slow down on the bad spots. I'm
just happy it's working as well as it is and I'll try to be patient. Any
way you can add a progress bar to this thing? :-)
Tim
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Justin C. Sherrill <
jus...@shiningsilence.com> wrote:
> O
On Sun, February 20, 2011 4:28 pm, Tim Darby wrote:
> The good news is that it's recovering a ton of data! The
> bad news is that it's taking an incredible amount of time. So far it's
been
> running 24 hours. Is that to be expected? The bad disk had approximately
> 50GB on it, as reported by th
:This was a 1.8.2 system. Having a 1.9 system handy, I plugged the drive
:(300GB IDE) into it and tried hammer recover for the first time to see what
:I could save. The good news is that it's recovering a ton of data! The bad
:news is that it's taking an incredible amount of time. So far it's b
I have a very old server that I was pretty sure was going to fail sometime
soon, so I prudently started building a new one. Unfortunately, I wasn't
quite fast enough and the boot drive failed this week. When it tries to
mount root, it issues the usual successful hammer startup messages and then
q
