Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I personally think that we do need to put the installer in our CVS
> tree.
Hm. Was there some objection to doing this?
--
Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<<
:I have some local modifications too, which is why I ask. :)
:
:Is this the appropriate forum to bring up the idea of putting these
:modifications into CVS somewhere? I know the installer is still an "open
:issue", but it seems to me that it's a key piece of code. Granted that
:most of the normal
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll have to dig up the changes. I modified the installer locally
> and generated a binary package as a one-off. This was rather a long
> time ago. I remember the changes were really minor.
I have some local modifications too, which is wh
:Ok, I now know the installer changed, but where are the actual patches
:to the installer source that result in 1.1.7nb1?
:--
:Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:>>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<<
I'll have to dig up the changes. I modi
Ok, I now know the installer changed, but where are the actual patches
to the installer source that result in 1.1.7nb1?
--
Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<<
"Challenges make you discover things about yoursel
I'm finally upgrading to 1.10.1 and while I can easily hit the cvsweb
to see what has exactly changed, I can't do this with the installer.
Did the installer change, and if so, where can I see the changes?
--
Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> The opinions expre
