Dmitri Nikulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Worthy archs are Alpha, Sparc (32 and 64), AMD64, i386,
PowerPC, POWER5, IA64. The rest is not very useful.
Am I missing one? Can you SMP ARM or MIPS?
I believe these duals (and the quads too?) are used in Cisco systems:
On 4/27/06, Jonas Sundström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitri Nikulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Worthy archs are Alpha, Sparc (32 and 64), AMD64, i386,
PowerPC, POWER5, IA64. The rest is not very useful.
Am I missing one? Can you SMP ARM or MIPS?
I believe these duals (and the quads
Hi...
I am checking out DFly since I have been getting more and more frsutrated
with FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x distro's. I still run 4.11 on all my stuff.
I guess my first real question is, how soon until DFly becomes stable
enough to use in a production environment? I am not running anything
fancy,
:Hi...
:
:I am checking out DFly since I have been getting more and more frsutrated
:with FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x distro's. I still run 4.11 on all my stuff.
:
:I guess my first real question is, how soon until DFly becomes stable
:enough to use in a production environment? I am not running anything
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:07:48PM -0400, John Von Essen wrote:
Hi...
I am checking out DFly since I have been getting more and more frsutrated
with FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x distro's. I still run 4.11 on all my stuff.
I guess my first real question is, how soon until DFly becomes stable
enough
Matthew Dillon wrote:
[...]
Still, beware that in order to achieve our clustering goals there is
still a lot of major surgery going on. If you need something ultra
stable, NetBSD or OpenBSD might be a better choice.
But only for the next few months. If you can stand to postpone
On 4/27/06, walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NetBSD (and also its derivative OpenBSD) runs on more hardware platforms
than DragonFly, and that is not likely to change so quickly. But given
a little time, I believe that will change also.
Who cares about being able to run on every evaluation board
