Sascha Wildner wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > card that's not supported by Xorg, it must work with the
> > old 8bit ISA Hercules monochrome card in my printer server
> > (I don't even think it supports graphics mode), it must work
> > without any graphics card at all
>
> Hmm, I'm just cu
Oliver Fromme wrote:
card that's not supported by Xorg, it must work with the
old 8bit ISA Hercules monochrome card in my printer server
(I don't even think it supports graphics mode), it must work
without any graphics card at all
Hmm, I'm just curious here. Have you actually tried DFly on your
Justin C. Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > I concur with that. If somebody wants to make a nice install/live CD
> > with GUI and whatnot, please go ahead! But I think this should not be
> > the official DragonFly CD. Our nrelease framework and the in
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I agree with Simon. The nrelease has a packaging framework and if
someone wants to put together a bigger release or a GUI-enabled
release or whatnot, all the tools are there to build it. If someone
(or some entity) wants to build and maintain a more sophist
I agree with Simon. The nrelease has a packaging framework and if
someone wants to put together a bigger release or a GUI-enabled
release or whatnot, all the tools are there to build it. If someone
(or some entity) wants to build and maintain a more sophisticated
release, nobo
On Mon, May 8, 2006 7:40 am, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> [redir to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I concur with that. If somebody wants to make a nice install/live CD
> with GUI and whatnot, please go ahead! But I think this should not be
> the official DragonFly CD. Our nrelease framework and the
with, say, 1995.
IMHO, putting a GUI on a live CD will just make it more big and heavy.
There are many cases when one may need no GUI but need a rather modern
but good, fast and stable system. For the server machine or for
hardware diagnostic system any GUI will just be a useless ballast.
I concur
