Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-02-10 Thread Tim Darby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:22:27PM -0700, Tim Darby wrote: Thanks for the suggestions! I installed qmail totally manually, since I didn't see a DFly package for it. There is no binary package because it can't be build without patching and therefore the package is

Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-02-10 Thread joerg
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:56:24AM -0700, Tim Darby wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:22:27PM -0700, Tim Darby wrote: Thanks for the suggestions! I installed qmail totally manually, since I didn't see a DFly package for it. There is no binary package because it

Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-01-15 Thread joerg
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:22:27PM -0700, Tim Darby wrote: Thanks for the suggestions! I installed qmail totally manually, since I didn't see a DFly package for it. There is no binary package because it can't be build without patching and therefore the package is restricted. Joerg

Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-01-14 Thread Tim Darby
Amitai Schlair wrote: Tim Darby wrote: Thanks, I got sidetracked with another project and just now getting back to Qmail on DFly. It appears that root, which is what this runs under, already has those directories in its path, so I don't think that's the issue. I'm not very up on RC scripts

Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-01-13 Thread Amitai Schlair
Tim Darby wrote: Thanks, I got sidetracked with another project and just now getting back to Qmail on DFly. It appears that root, which is what this runs under, already has those directories in its path, so I don't think that's the issue. I'm not very up on RC scripts but I found that the

Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-01-11 Thread joerg
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:12:38PM -0700, Tim Darby wrote: Anyway, I think I've either found a package bug or it's just me being clueless, probably the latter. As part of the Qmail install, I installed the package daemontools-0.76. After I setup the service folders and rebooted, I got boot

Re: Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-01-10 Thread Tim Darby
Justin C. Sherrill wrote: Tim Darby wrote: I got Qmail up and running today on 1.4 and it looks good. Coming from OpenBSD and having never done anything with FreeBSD or DragonFly before, it took me quite a while to figure out where everything was, but I did it. I have to give a hearty

Qmail install success on 1.4; possible package bug?

2006-01-08 Thread Tim Darby
I got Qmail up and running today on 1.4 and it looks good. Coming from OpenBSD and having never done anything with FreeBSD or DragonFly before, it took me quite a while to figure out where everything was, but I did it. I have to give a hearty thanks to the people who put the DragonFly