:On the discussion of large SSD caches, Anyone seen these :
:
:http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=18120%20600038493&IsNodeId=1&name=1TB
:
:-DR
I'm a bit leery of PCIe based SSDs. They have a ton of bandwidth but
they are also going to be driver-dependent and
On the discussion of large SSD caches, Anyone seen these :
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=18120%20600038493&IsNodeId=1&name=1TB
-DR
:That explains the noticable performance difference just logging in... I
:always just thought avalon was getting used for something else I didn't
:know about...
Yah, the bulk build runs Avalon out of memory faster than it can swap
pages out because the bulk build is also loading the disk
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I think our ability to advertise our features has been a bit
> lacking. We're programmers more than we are salesman.
>
> [cut] -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:21:19 -0600
"Samuel J. Greear" wrote:
> (...)
> I will try to answer here and now.
>
> The purpose of my question(s) is because I believe DragonFly BSD is
> not adequately represented in the easily accessible (main page and
> pages directly linked from it) literature on o
On Mon, September 20, 2010 10:15 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> TMPFS becomes more viable with swapcache too. We have two bulk
> pkgsrc building boxes. More than two even, but two that I regularly
> use. One has a swapcache SSD (Pkgbox64) and one does not (Avalon).
> There is a gul
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:49:11 +0200, Przemysław Pawełczyk
wrote:
[...]
> BTW. I looked over packages. It seems to me the applications are not
> "fresh". Wait a minute - I think that OpenBSD is more up-to-date
> concerning the packages.
[...]
We use pkgsrc for packages, so we depend on what is in
I think our ability to advertise our features has been a bit lacking.
We're programmers more than we are salesman.
Take device serial numbers in devfs for example. A simple feature that
gives one a guaranteed device path to access a physical hard drive,
no matter where it was
2010/9/21 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
[...]
> A lot of people ask about and got excited on the three characters ZFS.
>
> Do you see any real advantage and applications for HAMMER for such
> home configurations? With emphasis on snapshots being stored on second
> disks?
1. HAMMER is much more lightweight
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:21:19 -0600
"Samuel J. Greear" wrote:
> 2010/9/20 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:33:28 -0600
> > "Samuel J. Greear" wrote:
> >
> >> This mail is intended for the infrequent responders and lurkers on
> >> the list just as much as the regular posters.
> >>
2010/9/20 Przemysław Pawełczyk :
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:33:28 -0600
> "Samuel J. Greear" wrote:
>
>> This mail is intended for the infrequent responders and lurkers on the
>> list just as much as the regular posters.
>>
>> What has drawn you to use the DragonFly BSD operating system and/or
>> pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
