I THINK you can just do:
@XmlSchemaType(name="float", type=Number.class)
to handle this. You can add that to the package-info.java as well to make it
a package level thing.
Dan
On Monday 24 January 2011 3:26:07 am Tamas Kis wrote:
> We were spending quite a time on trying to bind java.lang
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 6:36:47 pm barakka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed the following behavior on CXF 2.3.1. If I declare a security
> policy at port-type operation level (Policy.Placement.PORT_TYPE_OPERATION)
> and include it directly in the wsdl, the policy is picked up correctly and
> pr
On Thursday 27 January 2011 1:26:45 am diptiv wrote:
> Update: It could be that the issue is with Intellij rather than CXF.
> Through command prompt, I can see the geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec dependency
> is getting transitively pulled in from cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws 2.3, but in
> IntelliJ I do not see t
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 11:53:14 pm Jason Pell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to be able to use the bean validator (spring or
> hibernate) with jaxb 2 in cxf 2.3.2. I am writing java first web
> services and I do not have a schema with which to validate jaxb for
> min / max length, etc constr
This definitely sounds like it falls really into a CXF "binding" (like the
SOAP binding or XML binding or CORBA binding) so you have the right term.
Honestly, there are VERY few people that have tried to extend CXF at this
level.For most people, they use the existing XML or SOAP binding
On Saturday 29 January 2011 8:18:12 am Michael wrote:
> What will that do for me?
>
> What can I do on the server and client sides with CXF API that I can't do
> with native JAX-WS? More importantly, how do I do it?
It depends on what you WANT to do. CXF is a completely JAX-WS certified
imple
Alan,
Better start a new thread for your question at the bottom. I can't
answer it. Otherwise, I think you're on track.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Alan Egerton wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> Thank you for replying again. My comments are inline below.
>
>> a) Alan, while my name is on a lot of co
Hi Benson,
Thank you for replying again. My comments are inline below.
> a) Alan, while my name is on a lot of commits on this project, I'm not
> an expert on the further reaches of web services, and there are parts
> of the architecture that I've never immersed myself in. So it is
> entirely po
There are many detailed parameters that you can control more directly
with the CXF API than with the JAX-WS API.
However, you might not need or care about them.
On the client side, the class you want is JaxWsProxyFactoryBean.
You can see a simple example in
http://www.benmccann.com/dev-blog/web-
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/aegis-21.html
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Michael wrote:
> I'm working almost exclusivly with Java First web services.
>
> From the "Why CXF" section of the Apache CXF web site I noticed that Aegis
> might be something I'm interested in looking into. I linked t
Michael,
We've been using CXF for a while now, in a more-or-less "Java only" mode -
meaning that the web-service functionality is practically invisible, which is
just how we like it. We use Aegis, and occasionally have to write some of our
own serialization to avoid loops, but again this code
I'm working almost exclusivly with Java First web services.
>From the "Why CXF" section of the Apache CXF web site I noticed that Aegis
>might be something I'm interested in looking into. I linked to some of the
>Aegis information from the CXF site and found a source code example that
>imports
What will that do for me?
What can I do on the server and client sides with CXF API that I can't do
with native JAX-WS? More importantly, how do I do it?
The Apache CXF web site does not seem to make this clear, nor does the
FuseSource documentation or sample code. Neither shows any example
Well, I just realized that "must understand" error was a configuration error I
made updating CXF to 2.3.2. Sorry for that. By the way, I have to adapt your
example to my use case since we adopted a code-first approach for our ws. But I
think that the new cxf 2.3.2 feature of @Policy annotation c
14 matches
Mail list logo
