RE: Asymmetric binding using soap 1.1 in server environment

We were always using the latest version. We recently switched to the asymmetric binding once we got the symmetric binding working with the custom wsdl that moved the individual policies into the general policy. My coworker Pohl talked to the user group about that discovery. Im going to do some

Re: Asymmetric binding using soap 1.1 in server environment

Is this something which was working correctly for you with older releases, or is it the first time you tried the combination? - Dennis On 09/29/2014 01:22 PM, Hemmer, Tim wrote: We are using the latest 3.0.1 from the July release Thanks, Tim Original message From: Dennis

RE: Asymmetric binding using soap 1.1 in server environment

We are using the latest 3.0.1 from the July release Thanks, Tim Original message From: Dennis Sosnoski Date:09/28/2014 4:55 PM (GMT-06:00) To: users@cxf.apache.org Cc: Subject: Re: Asymmetric binding using soap 1.1 in server environment Hi Tim, Which version of CXF are you u

Re: Asymmetric binding using soap 1.1 in server environment

Hi Tim, Which version of CXF are you using? The combination of WS-Security with WS-ReliableMessaging went through some major changes for 3.0, so it's possible this may have changed some behaviors. - Dennis Dennis M. Sosnoski Java Web Services Consulting

Asymmetric binding using soap 1.1 in server environment

Hello, I am witnessing a problem when running a war in a tomcat server when using Asymmetric binding, but not in my local junit tests. I added the encryption and everything works when running a local test (soap 1.2 is used). Before adding the asymmetric binding the tomcat environment also was w