My understanding ClassUnwrapper callback was added to support these
scenarios, Romain may've used it.
Sergey
On 17/09/17 23:27, John D. Ament wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:09 PM Sergey Beryozkin
wrote:
Hi
On 17/09/17 15:37, John D. Ament wrote:
Hey
So I just ran into an issue where Exce
Have a look at the sse cdi demo Andriy added to the distribution,
the feature (the one dealing with SSE) is expected to be auto-registered.
Re the transport id, by default CXF assumes it is 'plain' HTTP, so it
needs a hint.
What did you mean with 1) ?
Sergey
On 18/09/17 00:57, John D. Ament
Would you be in favor of having one checked in and used by default if
you're using CDI integration?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:41 AM Sergey Beryozkin
wrote:
> My understanding ClassUnwrapper callback was added to support these
> scenarios, Romain may've used it.
>
> Sergey
> On 17/09/17 23:27, Jo
I'm assuming you mean
https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/distribution/src/main/release/samples/jax_rs/sse_cdi/src/main/java/demo/jaxrs/sse/StatsApplication.java#L39
?
That looks manually registered.
For my #1 its a CDI 2.0 feature. I think it'll work with this approach
though.
Any thought
For it to be part of the CXF CDI module ? Sure, if it can help to
improve it then yes, I'm not sure if activating it by default will work
for Romain, but please create PR and let Andriy and Romain comment
Thanks, Sergey
On 18/09/17 11:08, John D. Ament wrote:
Would you be in favor of having
On 18/09/17 11:14, John D. Ament wrote:
I'm assuming you mean
https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/distribution/src/main/release/samples/jax_rs/sse_cdi/src/main/java/demo/jaxrs/sse/StatsApplication.java#L39
?
That looks manually registered.
It should not be there,
we need to add a CXF @Pro
Ok, I added
@Provider(value = Type.Feature, scope = Scope.Server)
Andriy, will CXF CDI auto-discover it now or will it have to be updated
a bit to have CXF features/interceptors picked up, same way we can do it
for Spring ?
Thanks, Sergey
On 18/09/17 11:27, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 18/09/1
Ok, PR is up - https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/313
Please feel free to review. This is handling for me both OWB and Weld use
cases. From my testing though, getting it registered early seems to work
better than later since I rely on the CDI integration to create the bus.
John
On Mon, Sep 18,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:27 AM Sergey Beryozkin
wrote:
> On 18/09/17 11:14, John D. Ament wrote:
> > I'm assuming you mean
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/distribution/src/main/release/samples/jax_rs/sse_cdi/src/main/java/demo/jaxrs/sse/StatsApplication.java#L39
> > ?
> > That lo
