Andriy,
Thank you so much for looking into this! My personal preference would be
to hold off on spring, and continue down our current path. However, if
fellow devs are otherwise inclined, I'm not fully against adding Spring,
and the benefits would be huge.
Again, many thanks!
Cheers,
Tim
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 12:40 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> I got a time to learn about Tika server more. The CXF's XML-based
> configuration,
> which could be used in Tika's context, relies on Spring Framework. Here is
> a quick
> snippet on how it looks like with respect to Jetty engine + TLS/SSL
> declarative
> configuration (ports, keystores are hardcoded there but could be taken
> from
> Tika server configuration, just an example).
>
> <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf" id="engineFactory">
> <httpj:identifiedTLSServerParameters id="secure">
> <httpj:tlsServerParameters>
> <sec:keyManagers keyPassword="change-me-please">
> <sec:keyStore type="JKS" password="change-me-please"
> resource="certs/sample-https-server.jks" />
> </sec:keyManagers>
> </httpj:tlsServerParameters>
> </httpj:identifiedTLSServerParameters>
>
> <httpj:engine port="19093">
> <httpj:tlsServerParametersRef id="secure" />
> <httpj:threadingParameters minThreads="5" maxThreads="15" />
> <httpj:sessionSupport>true</httpj:sessionSupport>
> </httpj:engine>
> </httpj:engine-factory>
>
> The problem though is that Tika server components do not depend on Spring
> Framework. Do you think it is non-issue and we could bring it in to
> introduce
> CXF's XML-based configuration? (I am not entirely sure, in this case the
> programmatic configuration looks like a reasonable thing to do vs bundling
> additional dependencies on IoC container). Please let me know what do you
> think.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best Regards,
> Andriy Redko
>
> TA> Yes. Thank you! I’m sure the answer is obvious. As we make more cxf
> TA> functionality available, we'd prefer to use the native cxf
> configuration
> TA> over our own programmatic configuration.
>
> TA> Generally, our use of cxf has grown over time, and if you notice any
> TA> anti-patterns, please let us know!
>
> TA> Again, many thanks for all you, Andriy and CXF team, do!
>
> TA> Cheers,
>
> TA> Tim
>
> TA> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 9:06 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hey Sergey,
>
> >> My apologies, I was off last week and only now caught up with all the
> >> things,
> >> so let me understand the problem first. I have looked at [1] and saw
> that
> >> team
> >> has added programmatic SSL/TLS configuration [2]. However, another
> >> approach team is
> >> looking at is to use declarative cxf.xml to replace the programmatic
> one,
> >> is that
> >> an accurate description? And once tried, we have separate Jetty server
> >> spawn up?
>
> >> Thank you!
>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3719
> >> [2]
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/c1c69dac4f5f948f38e0b198c3fdaad61a7d80be#diff-32fed2ec8d113792f680c2242ac6cb0cb67cfdd142660d993dbe92aaede00f6fR265
>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Andriy Redko
>
>
> >> SB> Hey Andriy
>
> >> SB> Great stuff, glad to hear, it is a collection of JAX-RS endpoints
> >> backed up
> >> SB> by CXF, so the team needs some help to setup HTTPS, Basic (and
> possibly
> >> SB> bearer JWT token verification going forward), I can help with
> >> clarifying
> >> SB> some details related to JWT, CXF has everything related to it...
>
> >> SB> Cheers, Sergey
>
> >> SB> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 8:02 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >> Hi Tim & Sergey,
>
> >> >> Yeah, sure, happy to help here. I think I understood the problem,
> will
> >> try
> >> >> to
> >> >> look shortly on how to address that in context of Tika Server (I have
> >> never
> >> >> used the server-based deployment of Tika yet).
>
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> Andriy Redko
>
> >> >> SB> Hi Tim
>
> >> >> SB> Apologies I'm totally occupied with Quarkus right now, I'm sorry
> it
> >> >> SB> consumes all the time.
> >> >> SB> Andriy, if you could help the Tika colleagues then it would be
> >> great,
> >> >> as
> >> >> SB> you've helped with integrating Tika in Apache CXF as well, recall
> >> how
> >> >> we
> >> >> SB> enjoyed the presentation about Tika at one of ASF Conferences
> :-).
>
> >> >> SB> Cheers, Sergey
>
> >> >> SB> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:55 PM Tim Allison <
> talli...@apache.org>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Friends and colleagues,
>
> >> >> >> Over on Apache Tika, our server has been using cxf for a long
> time.
> >> >> >> We've been very happy with its capabilities and robustness. So,
> >> thank
> >> >> >> you!
>
> >> >> >> Recently we were asked to add TLS, and we managed to do so
> >> >> >> programmatically[0]. The requestor on that issue noted that it
> would
> >> >> >> be great if we could use the regular cxf.xml file configuration
> >> >> >> process[1]. Further, the requestor noted that if he put a cxf.xml
> >> >> >> file on his class path, a separate jetty server was spun up. Are
> >> >> >> there better ways we can use CXF and its configuration process?
> >> >> >> This is how we're initializing the server [2].
>
> >> >> >> Thank you!
>
> >> >> >> Best,
>
> >> >> >> Tim
>
> >> >> >> [0]
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/TIKA-3719/tika-server/tika-server-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/server/core/TikaServerProcess.java#L259
>
> >> >> >> [1]
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3725?focusedCommentId=17526098&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17526098
>
> >> >> >> [2]
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/main/tika-server/tika-server-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/server/core/TikaServerProcess.java#L234
>
>
