Re: Property Placeholder configuration for jms:destinations

2008-06-02 Thread Jason Dwyer
an get the tests passing with my hack, I'll commit > it, but I'm really not happy about the solution. It smells of crappy > code. > > Dan > > > > On May 27, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Jason Dwyer wrote: > > > hi, > > > > we've been using th

Property Placeholder configuration for jms:destinations

2008-05-27 Thread Jason Dwyer
hi, we've been using the SOAP/JMS transport with cxf happily for a couple of months, and have come to a point where we're setting up deployment topologies for production environments, and need to make the values for the jms destination/address configurable. however, it appears that due to the way