riginal Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:32 AM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: DOSGI: dependency local transport and object binding not included
in cxf-bundle-minimal ?
Hi
Just out of curiousity, why do you need the local tr
.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:54 PM
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DOSGI: dependency local transport and object binding not
> included in cxf-bundle-minimal ?
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> CXF-DOSGi is simply using the cxf-bundle-minimal jar provided by the
>
PM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: DOSGI: dependency local transport and object binding not included
in cxf-bundle-minimal ?
Hi Sven,
CXF-DOSGi is simply using the cxf-bundle-minimal jar provided by the
main CXF project. If you think that the cxf-bundle-minimal should
contain more classes mayb
Hi Sven,
CXF-DOSGi is simply using the cxf-bundle-minimal jar provided by the
main CXF project. If you think that the cxf-bundle-minimal should
contain more classes maybe you should file a bug on CXF for this?
Best regards,
David
On 16 September 2010 14:02, Sven Zethelius wrote:
> I'm currentl
I'm currently working on an OSGI project that uses CXF as a bundle, so we
picked up the DOSGI cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.9.jar. I've noticed some of the
classes and other files that are included in cxf-2.2.9.jar aren't included in
the cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.9.jar. Of interest to me is the fact tha
