Hi Dan,
Thanks, that worked
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:39 AM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Equivalent of Message.setContextProperty
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Talkov, Roger <rog
rberosOid", “true”);
Dan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 6:40 PM
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Equivalent of Message.setContextProperty
>
>
>
, "true"});
Is there a better way to do this ?
Thanks,
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 6:40 PM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Equivalent of Message.setContextProperty
Just a message.put(…)
Anything tha
Just a message.put(…)
Anything that was set with message.setContextualProperty could potentially be
lost the next time contextual properties were calculated. It was only supposed
to be called by the routines that collect the various properties and if those
routines were called again, the
Hi,
I'm upgrading an app to be based on CXF 3.1 (from 3.0.5). In 3.0.5, I
could do
message.setContextualProperty(SecurityConstants.USERNAME_TOKEN_VALIDATOR,tokenValidator);
from within an AbstractPhaseInterceptor. This method no longer exists. Is
there an equivalent?
John
