Re: No mtom before message encryption

2015-10-06 Thread anpoky
Exactly, that what happend, that the attachment was not encrypted, because the policy defined to encrypt the body only. Anyway, thanks for help! -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/No-mtom-before-message-encryption-tp5761406p5761484.html Sent from the cxf-user

Re: No mtom before message encryption

2015-10-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
ked like expected. The base64binary element were not attached > and > the encrypted message is still mtom optimized and the cipherValues are > attached as expected. > > Is there any better solution than putting an inteceptor before and after > the > BareOutInterceptor? > > > &

No mtom before message encryption

2015-10-02 Thread anpoky
any better solution than putting an inteceptor before and after the BareOutInterceptor? -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/No-mtom-before-message-encryption-tp5761406.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.