CXF.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 13:31
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: About the Swagger feature (and an extension proposal)
I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6633
It is already configurable, thanks.
I can also move DocumentationProvider to a .model. subpackage, to avoid
having references to .wadl. in Swagger features :-)
Cheers, Sergey
On 09/10/15 11:28, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Yeah, I guess we just should make both options (re-grouping and
enriching
Oktober 2015 13:31
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: About the Swagger feature (and an extension proposal)
>
> I've created
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6633
>
> for discussion and providing PR.
>
> Regards.
>
> On 09/10/2015 12:35,
I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6633
for discussion and providing PR.
Regards.
On 09/10/2015 12:35, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
It is already configurable, thanks.
I can also move DocumentationProvider to a .model. subpackage, to
avoid having references to .wadl. in
Hi Francesco
Very nice - this is great that one can produce Swagger output without
having to introduce Swagger annotations (FYI Andriy Redko worked with a
Swagger team to improve Swagger JAXRS introspection).
Andrei Shakirin has a good point that JAX-RS annotations can not provide
the same
Yeah, I guess we just should make both options (re-grouping and
enriching with Java docs) configurable - so that it can co-exist with
the endpoints which do prefer setting Swagger annotations
Thanks, Sergey
On 09/10/15 11:26, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Francesco
Very nice - this is great
in Syncope and we're
using the updated CXF.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 13:31
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: About the Swagger feature (and an extension proposal)
I've created
https
