RE: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-08 Thread Oliver Wulff
May 2013 23:22 To: users@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: Fediz - intended project direction? On 07/05/13 22:21, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi On 07/05/13 16:25, snowch wrote: Hi Oli, The question is whether Fediz is aimed at being a framework or an application. For example, I would classify

RE: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-07 Thread Oliver Wulff
I don't really understand your question. The Fediz Plugin (deployed on the relying party side) is a framework component which must be plugged into an existing container. The IDP will provide new functionality with the new release. What exactly are you looking for as a deliverable? Thanks Oli

RE: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-07 Thread snowch
Hi Oli, The question is whether Fediz is aimed at being a framework or an application. For example, I would classify the WSO2 Identity Server and OpenSSO as applications. If you just want to deploy a WSO2 IS, or OpenSSO, you would rarely checkout the source code and start hacking around.

Re: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-07 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi On 07/05/13 16:25, snowch wrote: Hi Oli, The question is whether Fediz is aimed at being a framework or an application. For example, I would classify the WSO2 Identity Server and OpenSSO as applications. If you just want to deploy a WSO2 IS, or OpenSSO, you would rarely checkout the source

Re: Fediz - intended project direction?

2013-05-07 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 07/05/13 22:21, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi On 07/05/13 16:25, snowch wrote: Hi Oli, The question is whether Fediz is aimed at being a framework or an application. For example, I would classify the WSO2 Identity Server and OpenSSO as applications. If you just want to deploy a WSO2 IS, or