On Tue March 31 2009 3:41:40 pm hanasaki jiji wrote:
> Hmmm really good input back to the Sun folks... Any idea of how to get
> them to take notice?
Oh, we've bitched about it quite a bit already. They know. They just aren't
really willing to do much about it. Basically, each "team" is respon
Hmmm really good input back to the Sun folks... Any idea of how to get
them to take notice?
Also, could the Geronimo dependencies be refactored and renamed in
some generic manner? This may sound like alot of work for just naming
sake... I have folks that get nervous when they see a JAR or other
r
On Tue March 31 2009 11:32:35 am nicolas de loof wrote:
> Hi
> is there any reason CXF uses geronimo specs as dependencies and not
> standard javax.xml ones ?
> They are now available in http://download.java.net/maven/2/javax/ with
> Apache compatible licensing AFAIK
Other than the fact that I ref
