Having this example comes in very handy, thanks for that.
But I have two questions: is it already foreseeable when the "interface" will
be fixed ? Reason for my question is that I want to build our new solution on a
final release and not on a milestone.
Second question: is there an example how
> I know where the problem is but haven't committed anything yet, I can
> commit it in the next week only
That would be great and I am looking forward to it.
>> 3. do you know of any examples for this for 2.0 ? I only know examples for
>> 1.x and know that these won't work for 2.0
>>
>I guess not, I will update the example code to work with the latest trunk
>and let you know
I do not want to rush anyone so please take this as what I indend it to b
Over a year ago I developed a custom partition with ApacheDS that I want to
port to 2.0 now. The partition is "special" because it is only used to connect
to ApacheDS, the search in the sub tree is then taken care of in Javacode and
not in a directory or database.
The result for the query needs
Von meinem iPad gesendet
>> But I am only able to return ONE entry, I didn't find or understand the
>> concept how MULTIPLE entries can be returned. Can someone show me the right
>> direction ?
> The idea is to use a Cursor that maps around the partition and fetch the
> entries one by one.
>
>> Is this an error on my side is something wrong with the files I downloaded ?
> You can't run eclipse eclipse before having built the project at least once :
> the SNAPSHOTs aren't stored into the maven repository.
>
> Just run mvn clean install -DskpiTests first, then re-run mvn eclipse:eclip
Am 09.06.2012 um 00:03 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Le 6/8/12 11:38 PM, garb...@gmx.de a écrit :
>> In order to broaden my understanding I want to connect Eclipse to a running
>> instance of ApacheDS 2.0M7. I retrieved the sources for M7 from the svn
>> repository but failed in combining them.
In order to broaden my understanding I want to connect Eclipse to a running
instance of ApacheDS 2.0M7. I retrieved the sources for M7 from the svn
repository but failed in combining them.
I do NOT want to build ApacheDS, my only intention is to make all the
subprojects known to Eclipse to allo
Am 08.06.2012 um 13:58 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Le 6/8/12 1:49 PM, Garbage a écrit :
>> I learned a lot about the implementation of custom partitions and see the
>> changes in the API from search and lookup returning an Entry in 1.5.x and an
>> EntryFilteringCurso
I learned a lot about the implementation of custom partitions and see the
changes in the API from search and lookup returning an Entry in 1.5.x and an
EntryFilteringCursor later on.
I even was able to change an existing partition (shame on me: based on the
1.5.5 example, but I will switch to 2.0
Am 08.06.2012 um 08:55 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Le 6/8/12 6:42 AM, Garbage a écrit :
>> From what I know ApacheDS supports caching of search results, that means
>> when I issue the same search after e.g. one minute the result will be
>> returned from the cache.
>&
>> I believe I can use the released milestone 7 because parallel reads / writes
>> don't exist in my scenario. Or are there any other issues I should keep an
>> eye on ?
> You sure can use M7
Thanks for this confirmation
From what I know ApacheDS supports caching of search results, that means when I
issue the same search after e.g. one minute the result will be returned from
the cache.
First question: is this correct ?
Is this something ApacheDS does on it's own or is this the job of the
partitions involved ?
S
Am 07.06.2012 um 17:59 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Le 6/6/12 6:39 AM, Garbage a écrit
>>
>> 1. Can M7 be considered stable enough for giving it a chance in a productive
>> system?
> No. I'm sad to say that but M7 still have a huge bug that we are tracking.
Am 06.06.2012 um 05:16 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Definitively go for 2.0. The API has changed a lot, but this is (hopefully)
> for the best.
>
> Sadly, the documentation is not following the code modification pace :/
>
> Do you have any specific question ?
Thanks for that information, this
Sorry, I either mistyped or became a victim of auto correction: I meant
PARTITION
Am 05.06.2012 um 18:28 schrieb Garbage :
> I tried to build a working custom partition implementation for last days. I
> started with 1.5.7 but then found out that the working example I intended to
>
I tried to build a working custom partition implementation for last days. I
started with 1.5.7 but then found out that the working example I intended to
base on does no longer compile because of some API changes. Because of this I
switched to 1.5.5 and managed to get the example running (not tha
17 matches
Mail list logo
