Hi,
I made a test using the linux kernel to capture packets with the testpmd
app. In this way I used the following command:
# sudo ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c '0xfc' -n 4 --vdev
'eth_pcap0,rx_iface=eth0,tx_pcap=/tmp/file.pcap' -- --port-topology=chained
I show below the
I am not sure why it complains about "rte_eth_bond_8023ad_conf_get at DPDK_2.0"
when I cam compiling for 16.07. Anyways, if I change the symbol names, the
compilation goes through fine.
-nagp
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru <
nagp.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi all,
I want to use both PF and VF bound to igb_uio.
However, when doing so, VF init fails:
EAL: PCI device :04:10.1 on NUMA socket 0
EAL: probe driver: 8086:10ed rte_ixgbevf_pmd
PMD: eth_ixgbevf_dev_init(): VF Initialization Failure: -100
EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
Cause:
Hi all,
I want to use both PF and VF bound to igb_uio.
However, when doing so, VF init fails:
EAL: PCI device :04:10.1 on NUMA socket 0
EAL: probe driver: 8086:10ed rte_ixgbevf_pmd
PMD: eth_ixgbevf_dev_init(): VF Initialization Failure: -100
EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
Hi,
I am compiling DPDK as part of VPP (Cisco). It has rte_timer etc. turned
off. I enabled it and stumbled on this error. DPDK compilation is invoked
by VPP.
-nagp
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> 2016-11-10 10:37, Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru:
> > I found that
Hi,
Thank you very much for your response. I followed your comment about the
full PCI id and now the PDUMP application is working fine :). It creates
the pcap file.
My problem now is that I noticed that in the testpmd app I don't receive
any packets. I write below the commands that I use to
Hi,
Comments below.
Thanks,
Reshma
> -Original Message-
> From: jose suarez [mailto:jsuarezv at ac.upc.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:32 PM
> To: Pattan, Reshma
> Cc: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Capture traffic with DPDK-dump
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you very
Yes, agreed. We only use the STL in general purpose code, not the DPDK fast
path.
Nick
From: Anupam Kapoor
Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 11:14 PM
To: "Wiles, Keith"
Cc: David Aldrich , "Pavey, Nicholas" , "users at dpdk.org"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Is DPDK
Hi,
I really apologize for not noticing this mail.
comments are below.
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sandeep
> Rayapudi
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 5:01 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] PDUMP: failed to send to
Hi,
Comments below.
Thanks,
Reshma
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of jose suarez
> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 5:50 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Capture traffic with DPDK-dump
>
> Hello everybody!
>
> I am new
I found that librte_timer was not enabled and so the compilation failed.
When I enabled the same, it went ahead and failed at a different place
while compiling librte_pmd:
--
gcc -pie -fPIC
-L/home/ubuntu/development/libfwdd/src/platform/vpp/vpp/build-root/install-vpp_debug-native/dpdk/lib
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> Also look at one of the DPDK examples as it uses a lthread on top of
> pthreads and it may give you some ideas as to how multiple threads can
> work. I am trying to remember which example and my dev machine is down at
> this time, but just
2016-11-10 10:37, Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru:
> I found that librte_timer was not enabled and so the compilation failed.
> When I enabled the same, it went ahead and failed at a different place
> while compiling librte_pmd:
>
> --
> gcc -pie -fPIC
>
13 matches
Mail list logo