Hi Rami,
Thank you again. That's what confused me.
Regards,
Kushal.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 01:36 Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi Kushal,
> 0x3 is a bitmask of ports. It is represented in binary as 0011. This means
> that ports 0 and port 1should be used by the DPDK application that you use.
> If you wan
Hi Pravin,
See below.
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pathak, Pravin
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 2:30 PM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Crypto QAT device not found
>
> Hi All -
> I have server with Intel QAT c62x device.
Hi Kushal,
0x3 is a bitmask of ports. It is represented in binary as 0011. This means
that ports 0 and port 1should be used by the DPDK application that you use.
If you want to use other ports in your application, you should use a
different portmask. For example, to use port 0 and port 3, you need
Hello,
I want to use dpdk-pdump for packet capture. As explained in the
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/tools/pdump.html
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/pdump_lib.html I have compiled the DPDK
with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP=y and modified my application to initialize
the pdump PMD by callin
Dear all,
We are currently trying to build a multi-RX-queue dpdk program, using
RSS to split the incoming traffic evenly into RX queues on a single
port. It works fine when we use an Intel 82599ES 10Gig NIC. However when
we switch to the Intel XL710 40Gig NIC (i40e), RSS does not seem to
work
Hi All -
I have server with Intel QAT c62x device. I followed all documentation.
-Rebuild DPDK to use QAT
-QAT drivers are loaded.
-QAT devices are bound to DPDK
Crypto devices using DPDK-compatible driver
===
:3d:01.0 'Devic
Hi Rami:
thank you for your inputs.
Indeed, I had syntactic issues, and also, restarting the machine did the
trick.
One thing that I was not clear is about "portmask".
For instance, in the docs, we can find "./l2fwd -n 1 -c f -- -q 8 -p 0x3".
What exactly the value "0x3" refers to?
Regards,
Ku
Hi Kushal,
The output of dpdk-devbind -- status that you posted shows that there are
no ports that are bound to dpdk. This is the reason for the error you get.
You should try
insmod igb_uio.ko
( this kernel module is generated in the build process of DPDK)
And
dpdk-devbind.py -b igb_uio :81:00
Hi:
I am new to DPDK and my current use case with DPDK is minimal. Thus, I
think the l2fwd type of sample application should suffice.
Below is a portion of the output of `dpdk-devbind.py --status` command
My DPDK version is 18.08, and I am using Ubuntu 16.04 (Linux Kernel version
4.15.12)
Networ
