ich is a bit
>surprising as the documentation in rte_flow.rst (DPDK version 24.03)
>says that:
>``offset`` allows going past the specified packet field boundary to
>copy a field to an arbitrary place in a packet,
>Is this just a driver limitation or an HW limitation? Or could a flex
>item solve this?
>Thanks, Laszlo
Kindest regards
Raslan Darawsheh
ks, legacy socket not created No of ports : 0
> Calling DPDK-Init for PDCP
>
> But when I do not bind the mellanox nic to any driver, it is working fine.
>
> Please let me know if my approach is correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Animesh Tripathi
Kindest regards
Raslan Darawsheh
ence for the same?
>
>
> Thanks
> Anna
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
expansion for the items in mlx5 pmd internally.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Anna A
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 3:29:51 AM
To: Wisam Monther
Cc: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon ; users@dpdk.org
; Matan Azrad ; Slava Ovsiienko
Subject: Re: Using
I guess you can have a look at this guide:
https://core.dpdk.org/doc/quick-start/
which should help you on doing the sanity check which you are looking for.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Ashish Mishra
Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 4:02 PM
To: Raslan Darawsheh
Cc: users
Subject: Re
Hi Ashish,
Kmods are no longer part of the dpdk git tree,
Check this git for the kmods
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-kmods/
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Ashish Mishra
> Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 3:26 PM
> To: users
>
o make all frags go to the
same queue.
>
> Thanks,
> Madhukar.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
f you'll check the following:
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.html
section: 12.2.6.3 you'll see the following:
The field has_vlan can be used to match any type of tagged packets, instead of
using the type field. If the type and has_vlan fields are not specified, then
both tagged and untagged packets will match the pattern.
Which means from your rules it's fully expected to match both tagged and
untagged packets,
If you want to match tagged packets then has_vlan should be of spec 1 and mask
1, as for untagged packets,
It should be has_vlan with spec of 0 and mask of 1,
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
Kindest regards
Raslan Darawsheh
+@Feras Daoud, @Noa Spanier,
Guys,
Can you kindly assist with the bellow ?
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Kiran Shinde
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 7:26 AM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] Upgradi
@Mellanox Support Admin<mailto:supportad...@mellanox.com>
Hi Pravein,
Sorry for late response, but can you kindly have this with support admin?
I guess it might require some debug session to be able to identify the root
cause for it.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Pravein GK
Hi Pravein,
Do you happen to have any errors in dmesg output ?
Also, can you post the output of ibdev2netdev ?
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Pravein GK
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 10:36 AM
To: Raslan Darawsheh
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] common_mlx5: Failed
Hello Das,
Can you kindly try to add the following devarg to your pci-whitelist ?
--pci-whitelist :00:0d.0,dv_flow_en=0 -- pci-whitelist
:00:0e.0,dv_flow_en=0
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Das, Surajit
> Sent:
Hi Parvein,
Can you kindly confirm that the kernel drivers (mlx5_ib, mlx5_core) are loaded?
(lsmod | grep mlx5_)
If not please try to restart the kernel driver:
/etc/init.d/openibd force-restart
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 12:08 PM
> To: raktim bhatt ; Raslan Darawsheh
>
> Cc: users@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK: MPLS packet processing
>
> 18/01/2021 09:
++,
Hi Raktim,
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of raktim bhatt
> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 10:46 AM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] DPDK: MPLS packet processing
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to build a multi-RX-queue dpdk program, using RSS to split the
By the way, I've added to my example also the path to vdpa and regex driver
which are not needed if you are using only net pmd.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Raslan Darawsheh
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 10:27 AM
> T
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Gerry Wan
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 7:33 AM
To: Raslan Darawsheh
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Enable MLX5 driver v20.11
I've found that linking with static libraries will fix this problem, but using
shared libraries continues to succ
Starting OFED 5.1 it stopped the support for MLX4 pmd
And seems that you have some libmlx4 under your local lib dir,
In the meanwhile what you can do when doing ninja is to disable mxl4
compilation:
meson build -D disable_driver=net/mlx4; ninja -C build
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From
Hi Gerry,
Starting V20.11 the build system was switched to use meson only,
And if you have necessary packages for MLX5 (a.k. rdma-core) it will be built
automatically.
As for your question if you still don't need to bind mlx5 driver that's true,
its still valid.
Kindest regards,
Raslan
Hi Alireza,
We had this issue in old releases, and it has been fixed by this patch:
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69554/
can you check if it will solve your issue?
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Alireza Sanaee
> Sent: Thursday
Hi Tom,
Can you send an example for an rte_flow rule that you are trying ?
I guess since you are using RSS it might affect more the performance what flows
are being used.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Tom Barbette
> Sent
rule for each port that
you want.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bainbridge
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 1:10 PM
> To: Raslan Darawsheh ; users
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-users] How to use .last and .spec fields in the Generic
>
regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Andrew Bainbridge
> Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 5:30 PM
> To: users
> Subject: [dpdk-users] How to use .last and .spec fields in the Generic Flow
> API?
>
> Hi
>
> How should
Hi,
The mbuf will have this ol_flag PKT_RX_FDIR_ID and mark id can be restored from
this field mb->hash.fdir.hi
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Uiu Uioreanu
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 5:34 PM
> To: users@dpd
I would recommend using testpmd to test that since I didn’t get the chance to
test this example application.
And if you are using testpmd it would for sure work, but if it didn’t work for
you let me know what errors you are getting.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Cliff Burdick
Sent
Hi Cliff,
Can you please send me what exactly you are seeing?
As for the email that you are referring this is a limitation for MLX5 that it
can’t have empty vlan you need to specify vid in order for it to work.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
From: Cliff Burdick
Sent: Friday, October 12
Hi Georgios,
You are trying to create the same rule with three different actions.
I would suggest that you change your mask to be proto is 1/6/17
This way you'll have three different rules
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
> -Original Message-
> From: users On Behalf Of Ge
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuliang Li
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 6:56 PM
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] NIC rx timestamp
Hi,
Is there any way to get the NIC (hardware) rx timestamp for every
I'm not sure about that since as I mentioned before I haven't tried it before,
so give it a try and let me know if it worked for you.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Urdin [mailto:tobias.ur...@crystone.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:14 PM
To: Raslan
I think OVS-DPDK has static linking for dpdk and I'm not sure you can do it
this way
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Urdin [mailto:tobias.ur...@crystone.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:05 PM
To: Raslan Darawsheh
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re
I think you can upgrade the current version that you have as seen in this
article:
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/general/#hot-upgrading
but, I haven't tried it before.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Urdin [mailto:tobias.ur
You can refer to this community page for compiling OVS-DPDK with MLX pmds
enabled:
https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2637
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Urdin [mailto:tobias.ur...@crystone.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:35 PM
To: Raslan
>From what I'm seeing it looks like it didn't prop the MLX4 device at all.
Can you make sure you have it enabled in your DPDK package when you compiled
DPDK ?
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Urdin [mailto:tobias.ur...@crystone.com]
Sent: Monday, J
Hi,
I believe you are missing the --upstream-libs from OFED installation:
Try it as following:
./mlnxofedinstall --skip-distro-check --dpdk --add-kernel-support
--upstream-libs /etc/init.d/openibd restart
Then rebuild your DPDK.
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
-Original Message
34 matches
Mail list logo
