RE: Whether the creatation of flow rules of i40e NIC support tcp port mask

Hi jiangheng, For TCP rules, it should be flow director. I remember i40e supports 8K flow director rules. When the rule number is greater than 8K, only 8k rules can be created successfully. BR, Beilei From: jiangheng (G) Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 10:19 AM To: Xing, Beilei ; users

RE: Whether the creatation of flow rules of i40e NIC support tcp port mask

Hi Jiangheng, That’s because i40e only supports perfect match. BR, Beilei From: jiangheng (G) Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 4:52 PM To: Xing, Beilei ; users@dpdk.org Cc: Fanbin(Kira,2012 Blue Lab.) Subject: Whether the creatation of flow rules of i40e NIC support tcp port mask Hi beilei

RE: the packet delay is too long when I used dpdk i40e NIC sent single packet

ro enables immediate interrupt. This register can also be programmed also by setting the INTERVAL field in the matched xxINT_DYN_CTLx register. BR, Beilei > -Original Message- > From: jiangheng > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 3:28 PM > To: Xing, Beilei > Cc: users@dpdk.org; ji

RE: the packet delay is too long when I used dpdk i40e NIC sent single packet

hang, Yuying ; Xing, Beilei > > Cc: users@dpdk.org > Subject: the packet delay is too long when I used dpdk i40e NIC sent single > packet > > Hi Beilei: > we used dpdk implement a user mode tcp protocol stack, and we are testing > the delay of a single packet. > however,

RE: MAX_MBUF_SIZE causes queue configuration failure.

+ Simei. From: Dhamodaran Pandiyan Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:53 PM To: Xing, Beilei Cc: David Marchand ; Jeff Guo ; users@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin Subject: Re: MAX_MBUF_SIZE causes queue configuration failure. Hi Beilei, We're using, :5e:00.0 'Ethernet Controller X710 for

RE: MAX_MBUF_SIZE causes queue configuration failure.

Hi, Which DPDK version did you use? As i40evf PMD has been deprecated for long time. BR, Beilei > -Original Message- > From: David Marchand > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:28 PM > To: Dhamodaran Pandiyan ; Xing, Beilei > ; Jeff Guo > Cc: users@dpdk.org > Subje

RE: VF is still resetting

Hi Steve, Could you please help on this? Thanks. BR, Beilei > -Original Message- > From: Nobin Mathew > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 12:18 AM > To: users@dpdk.org > Subject: VF is still resetting > > Hi, > > We are running a dpdk app inside a pod, and orchestrating the app very > fr

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Intel FW 8.15 with DPDK 20.11 & 21.02

Intel PAE for help first. BR, Beilei > -Original Message- > From: Korolevskiy, Igor > Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 5:01 PM > To: Xing, Beilei ; Yigit, Ferruh > ; d...@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org; d...@dpdk.org > Cc: Yang, Qiming ; Zhang, Qi Z > ; Kylulin, Yury ; Tsvetk

Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Intel FW 8.15 with DPDK 20.11 & 21.02

ilei > -Original Message- > From: Korolevskiy, Igor > Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 4:19 PM > To: Yigit, Ferruh ; d...@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org; > d...@dpdk.org > Cc: Xing, Beilei ; Yang, Qiming > ; Zhang, Qi Z ; Petrov, > Andrey ; Kylulin, Yury ; > Tsvetkov, Mikhail S >

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK 20.11 - i40e 2 tuple RSS configuration

+ Alvin. Could you please help on it? Thanks. BR, Beilei From: Vishal Mohan Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 5:45 PM To: Xing, Beilei ; users@dpdk.org Subject: RE: DPDK 20.11 - i40e 2 tuple RSS configuration Hi Beilei, Thanks for the pointer. By using l3-src-only, I was able to run testpmd on 1

Re: [dpdk-users] Issues with rte_flow_destroy

Hi, What's the DPDK version you used? With the latest DPDK version, there's no such issue. BR, Beilei > -Original Message- > From: users On Behalf Of Antoine POLLENUS > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 8:34 PM > To: users@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-users] Issues with rte_flow_destroy > > Hi

Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK 20.11 - i40e 2 tuple RSS configuration

Hi, I remember there's no legacy API rte_eth_dev_filter_ctrl() supported in 20.11. Please refer to RSS Flow part in i40e.rst: Enable hash and set input set for ipv4-tcp. testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end \ actions rss types ipv4-tcp l3-src-only end queues en

Re: [dpdk-users] i40eVF pmd vlan id handling

; users@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei Cc: Yigit, Ferruh ; Zhang, Qi Z Subject: RE: i40eVF pmd vlan id handling On debugging further it looks like that linux driver enables vlan_striping by default when VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_VLAN is sent to the PF. static int i40e_vc_add_vlan_msg(struct i40e_vf *vf, u8 *msg

Re: [dpdk-users] Garbage value is returned while reading moudle eeprom for i40e (PF) with DPDK 18.11

Hi Anubhav, Thanks for the fix. Could you please submit the fix patch? thanks. BR, Beilei From: Anubhav Choudhary Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 3:13 PM To: Xing, Beilei ; d...@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org Subject: RE: Garbage value is returned while reading moudle eeprom for i40e (PF) with DPDK

Re: [dpdk-users] I40evf VLAN stripping disable

Hi Souvik, Yes, if adding vlan filter, the packet will be received with vlan stripped even if the vlan_strip is disabled. It’s i40e HW limitation, different from ixgbe. Best Regards, Beilei From: Dey, Souvik [mailto:so...@rbbn.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 12:26 AM To: Xing, Beilei ; Wu

Re: [dpdk-users] I40evf VLAN stripping disable

with VF mac address. Best Regards, Beilei Xing From: Dey, Souvik [mailto:so...@rbbn.com] Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:22 PM To: Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing ; d...@dpdk.org Cc: users@dpdk.org Subject: I40evf VLAN stripping disable Hi i40e/i40evf maintainers, I was testing VLANs with i40evf pmd and is

Re: [dpdk-users] problem with an additional MAC address on i40e

ackets with destination 01:00:5E:00:00:12 still can be received. Best Regards Beilei Xing > -Original Message- > From: Alex Kiselev [mailto:kisele...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 6:42 PM > To: users@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z > > Subject: probl

Re: [dpdk-users] VLAN tags always stripped on i40evf [VMware SR-IOV]

> -Original Message- > From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iain Barker > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:20 PM > To: users@dpdk.org > Cc: d...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] VLAN tags always stripped on i40evf [VMware SR- > IOV] > > On Tuesday, October 10, 2

[dpdk-users] Intel X710 dropping 802.1ad packets

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hope > (shope) mailto:shope at cisco.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 8:15 PM > To: users at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-users] Intel X710 dropping 802.1ad packet

[dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/29] ixgbe/base: update base driver

> -Original Message- > From: Klaus Degner [mailto:kd at allegro-packets.com] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 3:13 PM > To: Xing, Beilei > Cc: users at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/29] ixgbe/base: update base driver > > Am 30.05.16 um 04

[dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/29] ixgbe/base: update base driver

> -Original Message- > From: Klaus Degner [mailto:kd at allegro-packets.com] > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 5:32 PM > To: Xing, Beilei > Cc: users at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/29] ixgbe/base: update base driver > > Hi Beilei, > > I ha