2017 4:59:23 PM
To: James Cape; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] A confusion caused by the inconsistency in the source
code of acl_gen.c. A possible bug?
Dear James,
If it is only these two for-loops, then indeed the dfa[128] is never checked
against the index, and it might be the problem
loops will never overlap. The confusion now is cleared off.
Best wishes,
Xiaoban
From: James Cape
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 9:18:43 AM
To: Wu, Xiaoban; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] A confusion caused by the inconsistency in the source
code of a
ion now is cleared off.
Best wishes,
Xiaoban
From: James Cape
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 9:18:43 AM
To: Wu, Xiaoban; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] A confusion caused by the inconsistency in the source
code of acl_gen.c. A possible bug?
[Disclaimer:
f.
Best wishes,
Xiaoban
From: James Cape
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 9:18:43 AM
To: Wu, Xiaoban; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] A confusion caused by the inconsistency in the source
code of acl_gen.c. A possible bug?
[Disclaimer: I'm not at all familiar wit
ading.com<http://www.iextrading.com/>
From: users on behalf of Wu, Xiaoban
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 3:26:14 AM
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] A confusion caused by the inconsistency in the source
code of acl_gen.c. A possible bug?
Dear DPDK users,
I have been
Dear DPDK users,
I have been reading and studying the source codes of the librte_acl, since I am
very curious to know how to algorithmically implement a fast lookup process.
When I read the function acl_add_ptrs() in the acl_gen.c, there is one comment
saying that
/*
* Rather than going from
