Hi Rami,
Thank you again. That's what confused me.
Regards,
Kushal.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 01:36 Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi Kushal,
> 0x3 is a bitmask of ports. It is represented in binary as 0011. This means
> that ports 0 and port 1should be used by the DPDK application that you use.
> If you wan
Hi Kushal,
0x3 is a bitmask of ports. It is represented in binary as 0011. This means
that ports 0 and port 1should be used by the DPDK application that you use.
If you want to use other ports in your application, you should use a
different portmask. For example, to use port 0 and port 3, you need
Hi Rami:
thank you for your inputs.
Indeed, I had syntactic issues, and also, restarting the machine did the
trick.
One thing that I was not clear is about "portmask".
For instance, in the docs, we can find "./l2fwd -n 1 -c f -- -q 8 -p 0x3".
What exactly the value "0x3" refers to?
Regards,
Ku
Hi Kushal,
The output of dpdk-devbind -- status that you posted shows that there are
no ports that are bound to dpdk. This is the reason for the error you get.
You should try
insmod igb_uio.ko
( this kernel module is generated in the build process of DPDK)
And
dpdk-devbind.py -b igb_uio :81:00
Hi:
I am new to DPDK and my current use case with DPDK is minimal. Thus, I
think the l2fwd type of sample application should suffice.
Below is a portion of the output of `dpdk-devbind.py --status` command
My DPDK version is 18.08, and I am using Ubuntu 16.04 (Linux Kernel version
4.15.12)
Networ
