from:"bill ."

Re: rEFInd theme

2022-06-17 Thread Bill Yuan

it looks nice! thanks. On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 16:43, Antonio Huete Jimenez < tuxi...@quantumachine.net> wrote: > Thanks! > > On 16/6/22 18:10, Ian Grindley wrote: > > For anyone using the rEFInd boot manager and as a small thank you to all > the devs I’ve created a BSD theme including the DragonF

Re: ipfw3 nat to dynamic ip

2021-12-24 Thread Bill Yuan

Hi, I fully agree with you. it must be very helpful during the configuration, especially in your network scenario. Maybe, you can try to implement a script to do that, update the ipfw3 whenever the IP changes. Regards, Bill Yuan On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 at 04:32, samg wrote: > On Fri, Dec

Re: ipfw3 nat to dynamic ip

2021-12-24 Thread Bill Yuan

Hi, Yes, Currently, it supports IP address only. What do you mean by "Dynamic IP address"? Do you mean NAT to iface instead of IP address during the configuration? Or can you please help to elaborate? Regards, Bill Yuan On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 07:43, samg wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: Radeon Acceleration Disabled

2021-08-25 Thread Bill Sorenson

/e8de9e94be61d3d50fc134bbde36c014f25a6a56?hp=1dedbd3b06c68f627b782569529d5eb2b1bf (e8de9e94be61d3d50fc134bbde36c014f25a6a56) I re-enabled acceleration by just reversing the diff. -Bill On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 7:45 AM karu.pruun wrote: > > It seems not all radeon cards work with GPU acceleration, for instance > I get the fo

Radeon Acceleration Disabled

2021-07-03 Thread Bill Sorenson

lying issue has been fixed incidentally? Is there anything specific I should test, or another GPU I could try that is known to exhibit issues? -Bill

Re: ipfw3 nat help

2021-07-02 Thread Bill Yuan

Yes, already in the "git head". You can "git pull" and "make kernel" to have the changes. Regards, Bill On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 23:47, James Hobson wrote: > How do I get the fixed version? > Is this a classic rebuild from git head? > > James >

Re: ipfw3 nat help

2021-06-21 Thread Bill Yuan

Hi James, Thanks for pointing that issue out, it has been fixed. Regards, Bill Yuan On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 15:06, James Hobson wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to test out the ipfw3 nat module and I can't seem to get > anything to work! The example on the mailing list s

Re: ipfw3 check-state doesn't work

2019-02-15 Thread Bill Yuan

Thanks for reporting the issue and below is the fix. https://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/commit/72ce8e08d0708ac9f09d9cda56e3308ad8dcec48 On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 09:34, Aaron LI wrote: > Hi Nima, > > I can confirm this issue. I believe this is a bug in IPFW3. > > Hi

newbie questions

2017-05-03 Thread bill .

much. bill

Re: ipfw3: match multiple ports in a rule

2016-11-25 Thread Bill Yuan

Hi Chuck, By default, the filters are joined with 'and'. and currently the 'or' can join the filter which is same as previous one. Technically we can enhance it by supporting different type of filter to make it more flexible. Regards, Bill Yuan On 26 November 2016 at

Re: ipfw3: match multiple ports in a rule

2016-11-25 Thread Bill Yuan

Hi Chuck, Sorry for replying late. I was super busy recently. Yes, the ipfw3 supports 'or' block, and we can use 'or' to join all the filters. so your firewall rules can be shorten as: ipfw3 add [rule number] allow tcp to 1.2.3.4 dst-port 22 or 80 Regards, Bill Yua

Re: built load balancer use dragonfly BSD

2016-05-28 Thread Bill Yuan

ackets can still reach 8.8.8.8 after it has been forwarded to the 192.168.1.1 or 1.2 And the also ensure the reason traffic can be routed back to your source machine. Regards, Bill Yuan On 28 May 2016 at 22:36, wrote: > Hello. > we are create a load balancer. > but the example command