[Users] Carpet documentation?

! Best, Jonah Miller ___ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] Cartoon2D with the modern thorns?

, Jonah Miller ___ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] SPH in einstein toolkit

Hi Phil, I'm not sure what the status of SPH is in the ET (my guess is nothing public), but there is a relativistic formulation of SPH for fixed background spacetimes developed by Rosswog: https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/11/114108 In this picture, one would reconstruct the 4-metric from

Re: [Users] running ET on AWS

, Jonah Miller On 17-07-21 02:52 PM, Gary Pearson wrote: Anyone running ET on Amazon's AWS? thanx, gary w pearson ___ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] initial data for gauge wave test from apples with apples paper

Roland, EinsteinExact does contain both Gauge Wave shifted gauge wave initial data. They're provided as additional thorns. Here's the relevant part of my thorn list: !TARGET = $ARR !TYPE = git !URL = https://github.com/barrywardell/EinsteinExact.git !REPO_PATH= $2 !CHECKOUT =

Re: [Users] Excision with McLachlan

n) is fulfilled? > > and for my purposes having a single excised region is fine, the setup > i have in mind would be a collapse to a single black hole. > > thanks, > Miguel > > > On 27/03/17 16:59, Jonah Miller wrote: >> Hi Miguel, >> >> I'm not sure about

Re: [Users] Excision with McLachlan

Hi Miguel, I'm not sure about excising dynamically during evolution--maybe someone else has insight there. However, excision is definitely possible. I have been using the sixpatches Llama thorn to perform excision for a single black hole. I attach a parameter file to excise a Kerr-Schild

Re: [Users] CarpetIOHDF5 to S5 converter for yt

Hi Roland, I think this could be caused by an incompatibility with Llama. Erik can confirm for the development version, but at least for the release version, SimulationIO does not correctly slurp up Llama data. We would like SimulationIO to know the coordinate system, but this hasn't been

Re: [Users] question about ML_BSSN::fixAdvectionTerms

Hi Kyle, I am not sure the origin of this parameter, but it is indeed necessary. With fixAdvectionTerms=0, the evolution of the time derivative of the lapse A is given by partial_t A = (partial_t - Lie_beta) K - A where K is the trace of the extrinsic curvature, beta is the shift, and Lie

Re: [Users] intel compiler flags?

gt; >> -erik >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Frank Loeffler <kn...@cct.lsu.edu> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:38:08PM -0500, Jonah Miller wrote: >>>> I am working on developing a modified stencil for the Einstein Toolkit >>>

Re: [Users] WaveToy a in functional, multi-threaded style

.2l72clrq51dp0bba5eb12nu9gk Please join if you're interested. Best, Jonah Miller On 15-08-27 02:43 PM, Jonah Miller wrote: > Hello everyone, > > As a reminder, for those interested, I will describe my investigation > of using futures and a functional style of programming in charm++ in > the f

Re: [Users] WaveToy a in functional, multi-threaded style

Hello everyone, The code I discussed in the hangout is available here: https://bitbucket.org/Yurlungur/charm-functional-wavetoy Best, Jonah Miller On 15-08-27 02:43 PM, Jonah Miller wrote: Hello everyone, As a reminder, for those interested, I will describe my investigation of using

Re: [Users] WaveToy a in functional, multi-threaded style

/am9uYWgubWF4d2VsbC5taWxsZXJAZ21haWwuY29t.9tr22hcl896jljiktfu6n9cko0 I would like to set the time for 14:30 EST. Does that work for all interested parties? Best, Jonah Miller On 15-08-24 11:24 AM, Erik Schnetter wrote: I have a presentation at the Einstein Toolkit Workshop where I mentioned

Re: [Users] WaveToy a in functional, multi-threaded style

I seem to have forgotten to confirm a day. I would like to discuss on Thursday, August 27. So the time would be 14:30 EST, on August 27. Best, Jonah Miller On 15-08-24 03:39 PM, Jonah Miller wrote: Hello, During Erik's discussion of funhpc, I was asked to describe the results of my

Re: [Users] visualization-friendly HDF5 format

time step. Perhaps ask the developers of various post-processing and visualization toolboxes and ask them what information makes reading simpler. Best, Jonah Miller On 15-08-18 04:02 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote: Hi, We had quite a discussion about the problems the current visualization tools

Re: [Users] Post-processing frameworks

Hi Ian, Everyone, I have added a description of yt to the post-processing page. Best, Jonah Miller On 15-08-12 12:59 PM, Ian Hinder wrote: Hi, There was a discussion today during the Einstein Toolkit workshop (http://agenda.albanova.se/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=4936) about frameworks

[Users] segfault on ubuntu 14.10

, ubuntu.cfg, is the default, the second, yugoth.cfg, is a set of options that I've used successfully in the past). I know your time is precious and I appreciate any that you can spare. Thanks in advance! Best, Jonah Miller + set -e + cd /home/jmiller/simulations/static_tov/output--active + echo

Re: [Users] segfault on ubuntu 14.10

Hi Frank, Thanks for your reply. On 15-01-24 11:02 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote: You don't by any chance use another mpirun than the one that comes with the mpich library you link against? (I know - but that also happened to me once). Actually that turned out to be exactly the issue. Apparently