On 8 Apr 2019, at 18:03, Erik Schnetter
mailto:eschnet...@perimeterinstitute.ca>>
wrote:
I am trying to set up a binary black hole simulation that uses 8th
order accurate finite differencing. (I need the black holes to be
highly resolved, and I don't need the wave zone, thus I am not use
AMR.)
-erik
> Cheers,
>
>Peter
>
> On Monday 2019-04-08 15:01, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>
> >Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:01:46
> >From: Erik Schnetter
> >To: Steven R. Brandt
> >Cc: Einstein Toolkit Users
> >Subject: Re: [Users] BSSN, 8th order accurate -
r
On Monday 2019-04-08 15:01, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:01:46
>From: Erik Schnetter
>To: Steven R. Brandt
>Cc: Einstein Toolkit Users
>Subject: Re: [Users] BSSN, 8th order accurate -- how much dissipation?
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:41 PM Steven R. Br
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:41 PM Steven R. Brandt wrote:
>
> I don't know how to answer your question, but I hope to see the
> extensions to Cartoon2D etc. to come back to the toolkit.
They certainly will.
> I'm also wondering if you want to try using PreSync, even if boundary
> conditions and syn
I don't know how to answer your question, but I hope to see the
extensions to Cartoon2D etc. to come back to the toolkit.
I'm also wondering if you want to try using PreSync, even if boundary
conditions and syncs aren't your major problem.
--Steve
On 4/8/2019 12:03 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>
I am trying to set up a binary black hole simulation that uses 8th
order accurate finite differencing. (I need the black holes to be
highly resolved, and I don't need the wave zone, thus I am not use
AMR.) On the other hand, I am using Cartoon2D, and I extended it to
support 8th order interpolation
