Re: obr for felix bundles?

2008-05-27 Thread Richard S. Hall
Felix, I don't have a problem with this approach (or any approach for that matter). My only request is that we devise a method that is easy for us to update any time we have a new release. -> richard Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, I have been thinking about this issue and been discussing it

Re: Java Sandbox and OSGi

2008-05-27 Thread Marcel Offermans
On May 27, 2008, at 21:10 , Kass, Samuel-P58051 wrote: And if I want to use an OSGi activator for initialization, I'll need to run on a system that calls the start() method of my activators. For this I would have the activator simply instantiate the POJO and throw away the whole activator if

RE: Java Sandbox and OSGi

2008-05-27 Thread Kass, Samuel-P58051
> -Original Message- > From: Marcel Offermans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:37 PM > To: users@felix.apache.org > Subject: Re: Java Sandbox and OSGi > > > I was hoping that OSGi could integrate a little better with > existing > > Java methodology. Since the O

Re: Java Sandbox and OSGi

2008-05-27 Thread Marcel Offermans
On May 27, 2008, at 19:39 , Kass, Samuel-P58051 wrote: the framework? I mean your users probably trust the Java Virtual Machine, so where exactly does their trust end? The trust ends at the JVM. The OSGi framework implementation and everything inside it all have to run in the sandbox. Ok.

RE: Java Sandbox and OSGi

2008-05-27 Thread Kass, Samuel-P58051
> -Original Message- > From: Karl Pauls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 4:26 PM > To: users@felix.apache.org > Subject: Re: Java Sandbox and OSGi > > OSGi assumes that the framework is given AllPermission. > Sandboxing of bundles is done using OSGi specific managem

RE: Java Sandbox and OSGi

2008-05-27 Thread Kass, Samuel-P58051
> -Original Message- > From: Marcel Offermans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 4:29 PM > To: users@felix.apache.org > Subject: Re: Java Sandbox and OSGi > > Hello Sam, > > On May 23, 2008, at 21:08 , Kass, Samuel-P58051 wrote: > > > I'm investigating converting

Re: obr for felix bundles?

2008-05-27 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2008, 22:56 +1200 schrieb Mark Derricutt: > Just noticed this post - this is one of things that really annoyed the hell > out of me when I first started using Ivy as a dependency manager 2-3 years > ago - Ivy kept its ivy.xml files in its own repository that pointed to t

Re: obr for felix bundles?

2008-05-27 Thread Mark Derricutt
Just noticed this post - this is one of things that really annoyed the hell out of me when I first started using Ivy as a dependency manager 2-3 years ago - Ivy kept its ivy.xml files in its own repository that pointed to the ibiblio based maven repository. The problem I found with this is that ei

Re: obr for felix bundles?

2008-05-27 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2008, 11:25 +0200 schrieb Julien Vermillard: > Hi, > > A lot of Apache project ship OSGi bundles now. > For the one I know the best, for MINA everything is packaged as bundle > even AsyncWeb, > using bnd plugin for maven. So if this kind of OBR appear I'm sure a > lot o

Re: obr for felix bundles?

2008-05-27 Thread Julien Vermillard
Hi, A lot of Apache project ship OSGi bundles now. For the one I know the best, for MINA everything is packaged as bundle even AsyncWeb, using bnd plugin for maven. So if this kind of OBR appear I'm sure a lot of Apache project will want to push ther bundles. Now if we need one repository for ev