RE: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Hiho, hm... but the only thing the workaround fixes is when the server is already running and after that i start the host that is exporting the devies with e.g. 500ms delay. But in fact it can be vice versa. The host is already running, or the server is. The fix doesnt change anything by the way

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Robert Koberg
Can we get someone to respond from a country whose subject line response indicator is 'MV:' for a little balance. On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 20:28 +0200, Francesco Furfari wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I quickly read the thread because I'm back just now. > Unfortunately the Notify callback is over TCP, s

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Francesco Furfari
Hi Daniel, I quickly read the thread because I'm back just now. Unfortunately the Notify callback is over TCP, so unless we have a similar problem even with TCP communication, the topics you discussed should not be applicable in your case. Nevertheless we can always have a problem with the mes

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
>UPnP event are meant to be best-effort because they are meant to be >non-critical information which if lost will be received in the next >changing of the value or anytime the device decide to send the event. ok...but 17 devices aren't that much...consider you export 100..200 maybe it's a solution

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Ok - but if it is rememberingand not retrieving fresh values from the network there must be another problem... Because when i start the osgi framework all my upnp devices get imported...ok consider they're now in there... I start a upnp event listener... Hmm lez consider that the first time

RE: Exceptions and Declarative Services

2008-07-25 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi, As said by Richard, iPOJO provides an introspection mechanism collection data about created instances. This introspection mechanism gives information about service dependency resolution, used service providers... Of course, you can have information about the instance state (valid or invalid),

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Lenzi
Daniel Felsing wrote: > Hmmm... > > Look at osgi CMPN 111.8.1 > > Special care must be taken with the initial subscription to events. > According > to the UPnP specification, when a client subscribes for notification of > events > for the first time, the device sends out a number of events for ea

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Lenzi
Daniel Felsing wrote: > I know that you're the same stefano lenzi :) > The message was just copied from a mail directed to you and francesco. > > > And what would fix my problem u think?... > Cause you've now heard a lot by my posts..i'm curious what u think could > solve the issue.. > Cause IF i

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
I know that you're the same stefano lenzi :) The message was just copied from a mail directed to you and francesco. And what would fix my problem u think?... Cause you've now heard a lot by my posts..i'm curious what u think could solve the issue.. Cause IF it is really caused by UDP messages thi

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Lenzi
Daniel Felsing wrote: > Please Mr Lenzi...take a look at that... > > > Is it possible that my issue is connected to this one mentioned in the > cyberlink forum? Yes it is possible but only because we are speaking about the UDP communication > > Stefano answered to it in the cyberlink forum!! >

Re: Update a resource file

2008-07-25 Thread ribeiant
Thank you very much! it's work :-) ! regards Antonio Richard S. Hall wrote: > > Assume that you have a file like "config.xml" and the structure of your > bundle is like this: > > org/ >foo/ > resource/ > config.xml > > The only thing you need to do to make

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Please Mr Lenzi...take a look at that... Is it possible that my issue is connected to this one mentioned in the cyberlink forum? Stefano answered to it in the cyberlink forum!! http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1952657&forum_id=258158 take a look at it...is this issue already fix

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Lenzi
Daniel Felsing wrote: > Just forgot... > > AND why do the "lost" event updates do not get propagated in future???... > > I can start the m-search..manually...and if there would be any states > missing they should be delivered ANYTIME in the future...but they simply > dont... Because the packet c

Re: Update a resource file

2008-07-25 Thread Richard S. Hall
Assume that you have a file like "config.xml" and the structure of your bundle is like this: org/ foo/ resource/ config.xml The only thing you need to do to make this available for to other bundles is put the following in your bundle's manifest: Export-Packag

Re: Update a resource file

2008-07-25 Thread ribeiant
Thank you for the answer. The update works and the bundle with only a file will be updated correctly. But now I have another problem. I would like that the other bundles use this file. How can I import this file, so that the others bundles can use it? Thank you for help Antonio Richard S. Hall

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........ISSUE from cyberlink forum....

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Hi Stefano and Francesco, Is it possible that my issue is connected to this one mentioned in the cyberlink forum? Stefano answered to it in the cyberlink forum!! http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1952657&forum_id=258158 take a look at it...is this issue already fixed in the curre

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem? AH ... one more note...

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Just forgot... AND why do the "lost" event updates do not get propagated in future???... I can start the m-search..manually...and if there would be any states missing they should be delivered ANYTIME in the future...but they simply dont...the upnp tester does not get notified for hours... Kind

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Hmmm... Look at osgi CMPN 111.8.1 Special care must be taken with the initial subscription to events. According to the UPnP specification, when a client subscribes for notification of events for the first time, the device sends out a number of events for each state variable, indicating the curren

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Lenzi
Daniel Felsing wrote: > Nah... > The more i look into the problem the more patterns appear in my head. ;-) > > In fact there is no difference...i ran tests with m-search and without...the > behavior can be considered the same. > Server randomly receives no notification... > > > Ok - i have tried

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Nah... The more i look into the problem the more patterns appear in my head. ;-) In fact there is no difference...i ran tests with m-search and without...the behavior can be considered the same. Server randomly receives no notification... Ok - i have tried the following now: Running the "upnp t

Re: Exceptions and Declarative Services

2008-07-25 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Rubén, This is not possible with DS because DS activates components asynchronously and the state of the components is (almost) completely unrelated to the state of the containing bundle -- except that components may only be activated if the containing bundle is active, of course. Failing t

Re: Maven version to OSGi version conversion for SNAPSHOTs

2008-07-25 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Sahoo, As a workaround for this started using a special version numbering scheme to come around this problem: Bundles are released with an even micro number (e.g. 1.0.0 or 1.0.2 or 1.2.6) and SNAPSHOT versions have an odd micro number (e.g. 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, 1.2.5-SNAPSHOT). This guarantees

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Stefano Lenzi
Hi Daniel, Please look at my comments below. Daniel Felsing wrote: > Can it be that the "ongoing" m-search is influencing the status notification > behavior? Yes > > I started a manual m-search while starting my upnp event tester on the > server side, cause i thought maybe there was a problem

AW: AW: AW: AW: bug in felix upnp basedriver 0.8 ........m-search the problem?

2008-07-25 Thread Daniel Felsing
Can it be that the "ongoing" m-search is influencing the status notification behavior? I started a manual m-search while starting my upnp event tester on the server side, cause i thought maybe there was a problem with some leases or something. But the situation got even worse. Missing devices prop