Re: Failing to get felix scr logging

2016-09-16 Thread Benson Margulies
No, I don't have an OSGi config for SCR. I'm continuing to investigate. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> In a pax-exam test, I've got: >> >> CoreOptions.frameworkProperty("ds.loglevel").value("debug"), >> >> >> I get no messages. Other log messages generated from other

config admin and non-default file systems

2016-09-16 Thread Benson Margulies
I've got a use case in which I'd like to run the framework in a Hadoop cluster, and the users would want to store their cfg files on hdfs. Making config admin support this would not be terribly complex -- if the minimum java version were 7. What is the current version base? Another possible issu

CM and DS logging interpretation

2016-09-16 Thread Benson Margulies
I need some help interpreting the logging from DS and CM, if someone could be kind enough to have a look at the material below. I have an @Component named WorkerBusService which is never activated. I see no SCR messages related to it in the log except for other components trying to depend on it.

Re: CM and DS logging interpretation

2016-09-16 Thread David Jencks
Dunno about the config admin logging, but if you don’t see any activity setting up a component manager in the DS logs, DS didn’t get a configuration for your component. The gogo scr:info command will show this more easily, there won’t be any component configurations after the component descript

OBR command not working

2016-09-16 Thread Paulo Renato de Athaydes
Hi, I am trying to use the OBR command but it is not working for me. http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-osgi-bundle-repository.html#obr-shell-command I can deploy any bundle that does not have any dependency, but bundles which have a dependency (including one tha

Prop expansion via fileinstall but not configuration admin

2016-09-16 Thread Benson Margulies
The system property expansion feature of the configuration-admin behavior of fileinstall is quite convenient. I could code it, optionally, into confadmin. I wish I could have it without all the other mechanism of fileinstall that I don't need. Acceptable? --

Re: Prop expansion via fileinstall but not configuration admin

2016-09-16 Thread David Jencks
I don’t think this belongs in ca. You could use a ConfigurationPlugin. Unfortunately you’ll have to wait till R7 until this works with DS. Maybe Carsten already implemented the CA part, but I didn’t do the DS part yet. Alternatively you can code it into whatever management agent you are using