Re: maven-scr-plugin and scala

2009-07-28 Thread Clement Escoffier
On 28.07.2009, at 10:59, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Clement Escoffier wrote Hi, iPOJO uses ASM to handle annotations. In iPOJO, this choice made perfect sense as the manipulation is itself built with ASM. This allows to introspect all the annotations present in the bytecode of classes. Howev

Re: maven-scr-plugin and scala

2009-07-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Clement Escoffier wrote > > Hi, > > iPOJO uses ASM to handle annotations. In iPOJO, this choice made perfect > sense as the manipulation is itself built with ASM. This allows to > introspect all the annotations present in the bytecode of classes. > However, it will require that you compile your c

Re: maven-scr-plugin and scala

2009-07-28 Thread Clement Escoffier
On 28.07.2009, at 10:08, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: Carsten Ziegeler said the following on 07/27/2009 02:41 PM: Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: Hello I was hoping that with support for annotations the scr plugin would work with scala code as well. But in my mixed java/sc

Re: maven-scr-plugin and scala

2009-07-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler said the following on 07/27/2009 02:41 PM: >> Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> I was hoping that with support for annotations the scr plugin would work >>> with scala code as well. But in my mixed java/scala project it seems to >>> only

Re: maven-scr-plugin and scala

2009-07-28 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Carsten Ziegeler said the following on 07/27/2009 02:41 PM: > Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I was hoping that with support for annotations the scr plugin would work >> with scala code as well. But in my mixed java/scala project it seems to >> only look at the annotations in the java

Re: maven-scr-plugin and scala

2009-07-27 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Hello > > I was hoping that with support for annotations the scr plugin would work > with scala code as well. But in my mixed java/scala project it seems to > only look at the annotations in the java sources. > > @Component > public class Service { > > @Property(v