Re: is renaming app filename best way to ensure update on client?

2013-10-30 Thread Lee Burrows
just add a cache buster to the end of the swf url in the html. eg: ...myApp.swf?v=1 then you can just update it to v=2, v=3 etc when you have an update On 30/10/2013 15:14, modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Newbie question... after making my first app live on the server, I noticed updates to this

Re: is renaming app filename best way to ensure update on client?

2013-10-30 Thread Tom Chiverton
Or you can fix your web server : http://www.extravision.com/blog/whats-wrong-caching‎ Tom On 30/10/2013 15:29, Lee Burrows wrote: just add a cache buster to the end of the swf url in the html. eg: ...myApp.swf?v=1 then you can just update it to v=2, v=3 etc when you have an update On

Changing object's type without casting

2013-10-30 Thread mark goldin
Is it possible to make an object of a some type exposing itself as of another type without casting? Extending Proxy is what I need to look into? Thanks

Re: is renaming app filename best way to ensure update on client?

2013-10-30 Thread modjklist
Thanks Lee and Tom, I had no idea... thanks for your comments. - Original Message - From: Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com To: users@flex.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 8:40:28 AM Subject: Re: is renaming app filename best way to ensure update on client? Or you can

Possible mx:DateField issue in SDK 4.11.0 ?

2013-10-30 Thread Lionel A. Pierre
I'm seeing an issue in 4.11.0 while debugging a Flex project using the DateField. Clicking on the DateField's calendar icon to bring up the date chooser works when this Flex project is debugged with SDK 4.10.0. However, when debugged with SDK 4.11.0 the debugger stops 26 times on line 482 of

Re: Changing object's type without casting

2013-10-30 Thread Tom Chiverton
You could give your object a method that returns an object of the other type, and populate the properties as you like. Tom On 30/10/2013 15:42, mark goldin wrote: Is it possible to make an object of a some type exposing itself as of another type without casting? Extending Proxy is what I need

Re: Changing object's type without casting

2013-10-30 Thread Tom Chiverton
You can just build a utility class instead then... Maybe you could provide a bit more context if I'm still not getting it. Tom On 30/10/2013 16:41, mark goldin wrote: That means I will have to modify existing code that references this object. That is what I am trying to avoid. On Wed, Oct

Re: Changing object's type without casting

2013-10-30 Thread Javier Guerrero García
Wild guess here (agree that some code might help), but... have a look at the as keyword :) On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:42 PM, mark goldin markzolo...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to make an object of a some type exposing itself as of another type without casting? Extending Proxy is what I

Encrypt in Flex - Decrypt in .NET

2013-10-30 Thread Angelo Anolin
Hi, Anyone have a sample implementation of encrypting a string in Flex and decoding it in .NET? Thanks.

Re: Encrypt in Flex - Decrypt in .NET

2013-10-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Anyone have a sample implementation of encrypting a string in Flex and decoding it in .NET? This might help: http://code.google.com/p/as3crypto/ Justin

Re: Encrypt in Flex - Decrypt in .NET

2013-10-30 Thread Deepak MS
I used simple method using Base64 sometime back: Flex: * private* *function* encodeValue(value:String):String { *var* encodePassword:Base64Encoder = *new*Base64Encoder(); encodePassword.encode(value);