Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Hi Piotr, >Maybe we should put your example as part of Flex Utilities This sounds like a reasonable compromise to me, thanks for this hint. I'll try to put it there if there will be no objections. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Hi Olaf, Maybe we should put your example as part of Flex Utilities with proper instruction. [1] Add there only those parts of Fontawesome where we don't have license issue. - This will just show that users can use it. [1] https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities Thanks, Piotr 2018-02-20 19:17

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Thanks Om and Justin, after thinking about it a bit more and reading the license links I am not sure if it is really a good idea to include FontAwesome5 by default within the Flex SDK: - We increase the SDK size which is probably not the interest of all users - We maybe ran into license issues -

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

This is a very nice addition. I use heavly flatspark + Font Awesome on my Flex App with more than 500 views. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Hi, As Om said it going to depend on what parts of the free version you're intending to bundled with Flex to how the differing licenses need to be handled. There may also be trademark requirements around the brand icons and it may be better to not include them? The Pro version couldn't be

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

If I understand how we implement FontAwesome, we are relying on the font files and neither the graphics nor the JS code. The font files are licensed as: SIL OFL 1.1 License [1][2] As per [3], SIL OFL is a category-b license. We are allowed to use it, please make sure you read that paragraph in

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Yes. Same license: https://fontawesome.com/v4.7.0/license/ > On Feb 16, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Gabe Harbs wrote: > > The free version is MIT (with graphic files CC by 4) which I believe is the > same as FontAwesome 4 was. > >> On

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

The free version is MIT (with graphic files CC by 4) which I believe is the same as FontAwesome 4 was. > On Feb 16, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > Thanks, Carlos. > Kudos should go to akamud, the original author of flatspark who has > introduced FontAwesome

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Thanks, Carlos. Kudos should go to akamud, the original author of flatspark who has introduced FontAwesome within Flex ;-) >just check all the relevant things regarding license t I already took a look at it and it seems to be ok for me. @Justin Maybe you are following this thread: Because of you

Re: [Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Hi Olaf, that sounds very cool! :) congrats! Carlos PD: just check all the relevant things regarding license to ensure conforms apache guidelines 2018-02-16 10:35 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger : > Hi, > as soon I have time I'll try to make "Font Awesome 5" part of the SDK as >

[Demo] Font Awesome 5 with Apache Flex

Hi, as soon I have time I'll try to make "Font Awesome 5" part of the SDK as its own project. For those who don't know how to use "Font Awesome 5" with Flex: I've just created a little demo project and some explanation [1]. Hope this helps, Olaf [1]