I believe the first row dictates the measured height by default. I know
I've had varied results in the past when the first row was long vs short.
-Mark
You would check the measuredHeight of your renderers.
On 10/2/13 10:47 AM, "mark goldin" wrote:
>What would I check for that?
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure the code takes the maximum measuredHeight for all the
>> cells in that row.
>>
>> On 10/2/13
What would I check for that?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the code takes the maximum measuredHeight for all the
> cells in that row.
>
> On 10/2/13 9:52 AM, "mark goldin" wrote:
>
> >Do you mean for the same row?
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:37 A
I'm pretty sure the code takes the maximum measuredHeight for all the
cells in that row.
On 10/2/13 9:52 AM, "mark goldin" wrote:
>Do you mean for the same row?
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> The renderers must report different measuredHeights.
>>
>> On 10/2/13 8:5
Do you mean for the same row?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The renderers must report different measuredHeights.
>
> On 10/2/13 8:57 AM, "mark goldin" wrote:
>
> >I am setting up variableRowHeight to true but not getting rows with a
> >variable height. Am I missing somet
The renderers must report different measuredHeights.
On 10/2/13 8:57 AM, "mark goldin" wrote:
>I am setting up variableRowHeight to true but not getting rows with a
>variable height. Am I missing something else?
>
>Thanks
I am setting up variableRowHeight to true but not getting rows with a
variable height. Am I missing something else?
Thanks
