The fresh branch introduces new features. The still branch is suggested
for production environments. I too would regard the fresh branch as beta
although Charles Schultz makes a distinction between fresh and beta: see the
section Spring water here:
On 19/08/15 23:05, Steve Edmonds wrote:
...
Mike, check the URL you end up at from that link. I get redirected to
http://au.pcmag.com/libreoffice-40/2249/review/libreoffice-40 from the
www.pcmag.com site.
Steve
http://uk.pcmag.com/office-suites-products/2249/review/libreoffice
Somewhat
What is the purpose of comma separated machine data in a word processor
document?
That is to save in file. The more newlines, the easier differ the text
with vimdiff. Because if'd left these thousands symbols lines as is,
it would be really hard to see what just changed.
Why don't you save the
WTF are you trying to do? What is the purpose of comma separated machine
data in a word processor document? Why don't you save the shit in plain text
and then do whatever you want with it without struggling this horrible API?
--
View this message in context:
On 08/20/2015 06:12 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews.
I have every print issue of Byte on my shelf, right from the first,
Sept. 1975. I bought my first subscription, at the Ottawa Hamfest in
1975, from the original publisher, Wayne Green.
--
To
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 12:15 +0100, Mike Scott wrote:
Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as
published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00
I get a LO 5.0 review... but it is OK, you aren't missing anything. It
is a pretty typical drive-by rubbish review which spends most
steveedmonds wrote
On 2015-08-19 12:55, James Knott wrote:
On 08/18/2015 07:23 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review
for 4.0
It says 5.0, when I click on the link.
Must be a redirect because that link takes me to
I managed to get the original article by using google translate, and
than choose to see the original language ;)
The lay-out is cluttered, but the article is readable.
https://translate.google.be/translate?hl=nlsl=entl=nlu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcmag.com%2Farticle2%2F0%2C2817%2C2418419%2C00.aspanno=2
Quick and dirty Basic routine to copy properties from obj1 to obj2:
Sub cloneProperties(obj1, obj2)
dim a, i, s, v
a() = obj1.PropertySetInfo.getProperties()
on error goto resumeNextErr
for each i in a()
s = i.Name
v = obj1.getPropertyValue(s)
obj2.setPropertyValue(s,v)
On 2015-08-20 22:10, toki wrote:
On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews
Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review?
It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review.
EASY MONEY!
The days of the paid, professional
On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews
Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review?
It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review.
EASY MONEY!
The days of the paid, professional reviewer are numbered.
From one side,
Am 20.08.2015 um 19:09 schrieb chimak111:
The fresh branch introduces new features. The still branch is suggested
for production environments. I too would regard the fresh branch as beta
although Charles Schultz makes a distinction between fresh and beta: see the
section Spring water here:
Hello,
My little Java program uses Libreoffice's (Openoffice's) API named UNO to
talk to an installation of the new Libreoffice Version 5 (5.0.0.5).
Under Ubuntu Linux, the Java programs runs in a 64-Bit Java Virtual Machine
(JVM) and happily talks via UNO to Libreoffice 64-Bit to use some
in agreement, seemed like an ad. for MSFT ;-)
From: Gabriele Ponzo gpo...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
To: Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
I've always
First: Attachments are not allowed on this list;
you'll need to upload it to some on-line site, then send the
URL; for us to have access to it.
Second: any PP made with MsFt programs, can be opened using LO's
Impress program; if you click on the PP then choose 'Open',
Yay, that's actually cool :з So, I modified the code a bit to make it
Pythonish. It doesn't print all existing properties though, but I
modified it to print also at least every paragraph property. It is:
doc = desktop.loadComponentFromURL(file:///tmp/output.odt ,_blank, 0, ())
file =
On 20/08/15 12:20, Pedro wrote:
steveedmonds wrote
On 2015-08-19 12:55, James Knott wrote:
On 08/18/2015 07:23 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review
for 4.0
It says 5.0, when I click on the link.
Must be a redirect because that
17 matches
Mail list logo
