Re: [libreoffice-users] new book

new book http://www.pitonyak.org/OOME_**3_0.odt :0) thanks Pitonyak for the excellent work +1 on that. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mai

Re: [libreoffice-users] upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:29:38 -0600, "Cliff Scott" wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1: >** Reply to message from Thorne on Fri, 25 Feb >2011 10:24:58 -0500 > >> How do I upgrade my libreoffice install? I have win xp home with sp3.. >> there is no update setting on my ins

Re: [libreoffice-users] upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:24:25 -0600, "Cliff Scott" wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1: >** Reply to message from Vic Dura on Fri, 25 Feb 2011 >20:31:03 -0600 >> >> On a WinXP system, can LibreOffice 3.3.1 be installed over OpenOffice >&g

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:13:12 -0800, NoOp wrote Re [libreoffice-users] Re: upgrade from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1: >> >> On a WinXP system, can LibreOffice 3.3.1 be installed over OpenOffice >> 3.3.0? >> > >It's an issue: >http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/ > >For Windows users that have Op

[libreoffice-users] Ellison's Oracle washes hands of OpenOffice

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/15/oracle_letting_openoffice_go/ Oracle is turning OpenOffice into a purely community project, and no longer plans to offer a commercial version of the collaboration suite loved by many. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org Postin

Re: [libreoffice-users] using libre office with portable apps

On Thu, 19 May 2011 10:01:37 +0100, "Colin" wrote Re [libreoffice-users] using libre office with portable apps: >1) When using Writer or any other of the programms from LO through >"Portable Apps" off a USB stick, is it normal that it takes about 2 mins >or more to load I seem to wait forever. I

Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT Top/Bottom posting] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:09:25 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT Top/Bottom posting] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken: >On 2011-05-31 11:20 AM, Lindsay Graham wrote: >> I get so sick of being forced to page down to see the latest text that, >> unless it is a subject in which

Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT Top/Bottom posting] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:36:03 +0100, e-letter wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT Top/Bottom posting] Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken: >An incredible topic of discussion... Indeed it has been. It enabled me to easily identify and add several top-posting morons to my plonk list. Now I can avoid

Re: [libreoffice-users] Old Hat "Top or Bottom Posting"!

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:39:31 +0200, "Thomas HInd II" wrote Re [libreoffice-users] Old Hat "Top or Bottom Posting"!: >Hello, > >It is time for action, those that can't follow the rules of the road need to >have their license taken away. If the rules state you should drive on the >right side of t

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Old Hat "Top or Bottom Posting"!

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:36:47 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Old Hat "Top or Bottom Posting"!: >On 2011-06-02 7:11 AM, Ken Springer wrote: >> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > >Is in the footer of every message posted to the list Ken.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Is this list unmoderated?

On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:47:03 +1000, Simon Cropper wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Is this list unmoderated?: >On 03/06/11 04:18, PLO wrote: >> So I was just curious, is this an unmoderated list? > >It appears so. > >At the moment I am considering creating my own personal blacklist of >users to